ArticleMolecular medicine reports2017
Application of a co‑expression network for the analysis of aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cell lines to predict the clinical outcome of patients.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks for Breast Cancer Based on Genetic Modules.BME frontiers · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of miR-10a-3p in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Article
- DOK5 as a Prognostic Biomarker of Gastric Cancer Immunoinvasion: A Bioinformatics Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Identification of potential core genes at single-cell level contributing to pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through bioinformatics analysis.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022Article
- Knockdown of NCOA5 suppresses viability, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and induces adhesion of breast cancer cells.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Analysis of H3K4me3-ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq data to understand the putative role of miRNAs and their target genes in breast cancer cell lines.Genomics & informatics · 2021Article
- A Novel IGLC2 Gene Linked With Prognosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Annexin A3, a Calcium-Dependent Phospholipid-Binding Protein: Implication in Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Immortalization up-regulated protein promotes tumorigenesis and inhibits apoptosis of papillary thyroid cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Identifying Potential Prognostic Markers for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma by Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Article
- Downregulation of Immortalization-Upregulated Protein Suppresses the Progression of Breast Cancer Cell Lines by Regulating Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Identification of a Recurrence Signature and Validation of Cell Infiltration Level of Thyroid Cancer Microenvironment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
- Survival-related risk score of lung adenocarcinoma identified by weight gene co-expression network analysis.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Identification of key pathways and genes in different types of chronic kidney disease based on WGCNA.Molecular medicine reports · 2019Article
- Overexpression of TMEM47 Induces Tamoxifen Resistance in Human Breast Cancer Cells.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer metastasis is a demanding problem in clinical treatment of patients with breast cancer. It is necessary to examine the mechanisms of metastasis for developing therapies. Classification of the aggressiveness of breast cancer is an important issue in biological study and for clinical decisions. Although aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cells can be easily distinguished among different cell lines, it is very difficult to distinguish in clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to use the gene expression analysis from breast cancer cell lines to predict clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer. Weighted gene co‑expression network analysis (WGCNA) is a powerful method to account for correlations between genes and extract co‑expressed modules of genes from large expression datasets. Therefore, WGCNA was applied to explore the differences in sub‑networks between aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cell lines. The greatest difference topological overlap networks in both groups include potential information to understand the mechanisms of aggressiveness. The results show that the blue and red modules were significantly associated with the biological processes of aggressiveness. The sub‑network, which consisted of TMEM47, GJC1, ANXA3, TWIST1 and C19orf33 in the blue module, was associated with an aggressive phenotype. The sub‑network of LOC100653217, CXCL12, SULF1, DOK5 and DKK3 in the red module was associated with a non‑aggressive phenotype. In order to validate the hazard ratio of these genes, the prognostic index was constructed to integrate them and examined using data from the Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Patients with breast cancer from TCGA in the high‑risk group had a significantly shorter overall survival time compared with patients in the low‑risk group (hazard ratio=1.231, 95% confidence interval=1.058‑1.433, P=0.0071, by the Wald test). A similar result was produced from the GEO database. The findings may provide a novel strategy for measuring cancer aggressiveness in patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.