Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28944734›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2017

Outcomes-Based Contracting Experience: Research Findings from U.S. and European Stakeholders.

Tara Nazareth, John J Ko, Rahul Sasane, Christian Frois, Stephen Carpenter, Sebastian Demean, Ashok Vegesna, Eric Wu, Robert P Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How Do Iranian Stakeholders Think About Pharmaceutical Managed Entry Agreements?Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. International Price Comparisons of Anticancer Drugs: A Scheme for Improving Patient Accessibility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tara Nazareth1 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey.
John J Ko1 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Rahul Sasane1 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Christian Frois2 Analysis Group, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephen Carpenter2 Analysis Group, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sebastian Demean2 Analysis Group, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ashok Vegesna1 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Eric Wu2 Analysis Group, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert P Navarro3 University of Florida, Gainesville.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes-based contracts (OBCs), a type of risk-sharing arrangement (RSA), have emerged as a promising avenue for payers to engage with pharmaceutical manufacturers to share risk and improve patient access to medicines via evaluation of real-world outcomes.

objectiveTo assess the level of recent OBC activity and stakeholder perceptions of these arrangements, as well as the outlook for future OBC activity from a payer and manufacturer perspective in the United States and EU-5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom).

methodsUsing a structured questionnaire, interviews were conducted with 27 experts, including 14 U.S. payers, 5 EU-5 national payers, and 8 manufacturer pricing/market access executives (4 U.S., 4 EU-5). We also used the University of Washington's Performance Based Risk-Sharing (PBRS) database and other targeted publicly available information.

resultsPublicly disclosed information on OBCs understates the level of OBC activity, since many arrangements are confidential. Overall, U.S. and EU-5 interviewees generally expected that 2 to 3 times more OBCs would be implemented in the next 5 years than in the previous 5 years. Key drivers included the introduction of a national OBC framework in Spain, potentially a similar framework in the United Kingdom, a growing sickness fund activity in Germany, and a U.S. movement towards accountable care. Motivation for OBCs varied markedly across markets and stakeholders, with operational feasibility noted as a significant hurdle in the United States and France. Along with improving health outcomes, cost and financial risk reduction were the primary OBC motivators for payers, while potential access or reimbursement gains were key factors for manufacturers.

conclusionsUsing direct input from U.S. and EU-5 payer and pharmaceutical manufacturer decision makers, this research suggests that high OBC growth is expected in the EU-5 and, to a more moderate extent, in the United States, particularly if clear, simpler OBC frameworks can be developed. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Novartis employees were involved in all aspects of this study. Vegesna and Sasane are employed by and own stock in Novartis. Nazareth and Ko were employees of Novartis at the time of this study. Frois, Demean, Carpenter, and Wu are or have been employed by Analysis Group, which received a grant from Novartis for this research. Navarro received consulting fees from Novartis for his involvement in this research. Study concept and design were contributed by Sasane, Frois, Nazareth, and Wu. Navarro, Demean, and Frois took the lead in data collection, assisted by Carpenter, Ko, and Nazareth. Data interpretation was provided by Frois, Carpenter, Nazareth, and Ko, along with Sasane, Demean, Wu, and Navarro. The manuscript was written by Frois, Demean, Nazareth, and Ko, along with Sasane, Carpenter, Wu, and Navarro, and revised by Frois, Ko, and Vegesna, along with Sasane, Nazareth, Wu, and Navarro.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDrug IndustryEuropeHumansPharmacyResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28944734
PMCPMC10398222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.