Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28944523›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2018

A new method for analysing transition to psychosis: Joint modelling of time-to-event outcome with time-dependent predictors.

Hok Pan Yuen, Andrew Mackinnon, Barnaby Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Beyond the "at risk mental state" concept: transitioning to transdiagnostic psychiatry.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hok Pan YuenOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1237-1322
Andrew MackinnonCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0831-9801
Barnaby NelsonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An active area in psychosis research is the identification of predictors of transition to a psychotic state among those who are assessed as being at high risk of psychosis. Many of the potential predictors are time dependent in the sense that they may change over time and are measured at a number of assessment time points. Examples are various psychopathological measures such as negative symptoms, positive symptoms, depression, and anxiety. Most research in transition to psychosis has not made use of the dynamic nature of these measures, probably because suitable statistical methods and software have not been easily available. However, a relatively new statistical methodology is well suited to include such time-dependent predictors in transition to psychosis analysis. This methodology is called joint modelling and has recently been incorporated in mainstream statistical software. This paper describes this methodology and demonstrates its usefulness using data from one of the pioneering studies on transition to psychosis.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, StatisticalProdromal SymptomsAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansPsychotic DisordersRiskTime Factorsjoint modellingtime-to-event outcometransition to psychosis

Identifiers

PMID28944523
PMCPMC6877213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.