ArticleGenetic epidemiology2017
Evolutionarily derived networks to inform disease pathways.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methods to identify genes or pathways associated with complex diseases are often inadequate to elucidate most risk because they make implicit and oversimplified assumptions about underlying models of disease etiology. These can lead to incomplete or inadequate conclusions. To address this, we previously developed human phenotype networks (HPN), linking phenotypes based on shared biology. However, such visualization alone is often uninterpretable, and requires additional filtering. Here, we expand the HPN to include another method, evolutionary triangulation (ET). ET utilizes the hypothesis that alleles affecting disease risk in multiple populations are distributed consistently with differences in disease prevalence and compares allele frequencies among populations and their relationship to phenotype prevalence. We hypothesized that combining these methods will increase our ability to detect genetic patterns of association in complex diseases. We combined HPN and ET to identify network patterns associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a leading cause of death worldwide. Fasting glucose, a continuous trait, was used as a proxy for T2DM and differs significantly among continental populations. The combined method identified several diabetes-related traits and several phenotypes related to cardiovascular diseases, for which diabetes is a major risk factor. ET-HPN found more phenotypes related to our target and related phenotypes than the application of either method alone. Not only could we detect phenotype connections related to T2DM, but we also identified phenotypes that are distributed in parallel to it, e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Our analyses showed that ET-filtered HPN provides information that neither technique can individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.