Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28944442›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2017

Protein folding and tRNA biology.

Mónica Marín, Tamara Fernández-Calero, Ricardo Ehrlich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mónica MarínBiochemistry-Molecular Biology Section, Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay. marin@fcien.edu.uy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0162-9500
Tamara Fernández-CaleroBiochemistry-Molecular Biology Section, Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Ricardo EhrlichBiochemistry-Molecular Biology Section, Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Universidad de la República de Uruguay · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypeptides can fold into tertiary structures while they are synthesized by the ribosome. In addition to the amino acid sequence, protein folding is determined by several factors within the cell. Among others, the folding pathway of a nascent polypeptide can be affected by transient interactions with other proteins, ligands, or the ribosome, as well as by the translocation through membrane pores. Particularly, the translation machinery and the population of tRNA under different physiological or adaptive responses can dramatically affect protein folding. This review summarizes the scientific evidence describing the role of translation kinetics and tRNA populations on protein folding and addresses current efforts to better understand tRNA biology. It is organized into three main parts, which are focused on: (i) protein folding in the cellular context; (ii) tRNA biology and the complexity of the tRNA population; and (iii) available methods and technical challenges in the characterization of tRNA pools. In this manner, this work illustrates the ways by which functional properties of proteins may be modulated by cellular tRNA populations.

Indexed as

Codon usageCodon usage biasIn vivo protein foldingTranslation kineticsTranslation machinerytRNAtRNA modified basestRNA populationtRNA population adaptationtRNA quantificationtRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28944442
PMCPMC5662057
OpenAlexW2757957259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.