Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28944333›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2017

Colonoscopic perforations: Single center experience and review of the literature.

Şükrü Çolak, Bünyamin Gürbulak, Hasan Bektaş, Ekrem Çakar, Yiğit Düzköylü, Savaş Bayrak, Ayhan Güneyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Şükrü ÇolakClinic of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Bünyamin GürbulakClinic of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Hasan BektaşClinic of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ekrem ÇakarClinic of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Yiğit DüzköylüClinic of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Savaş BayrakClinic of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ayhan GüneyiClinic of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIatrogenic colonic perforation is a well-known complication that can increase mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Closer follow-up and a well-planned treatment strategy are required when perforation arises as a complication. The aims of this study are to (1) report our experience with a large colonoscopy series; (2) evaluate the underlying mechanisms of iatrogenic colonic perforation; (3) discuss the ideal period between onset and treatment; and (4) review the current literature regarding the management of iatrogenic colonic perforations. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients who underwent colonoscopy between January 2005 and May 2015 at a single center were reviewed retrospectively. Procedures during which colonic perforations occurred were documented and analyzed.

resultsBetween January 2005 and May 2015, 31,655 patients underwent colonoscopy and 5,214 patients underwent recto-sigmoidoscopy at our center. Thirteen of these procedures were associated with perforation. The perforation rate was found to be 0.041%. The most frequent locations of perforation were (a) the rectosigmoid junction, (b) the proximal rectum, and (c) the sigmoid colon. Management included surgical treatment in 11 patients and conservative management in 2 patients. Twelve patients (92.31%) were discharged uneventfully, and death occurred in one (7.69%) patient.

conclusionAlthough they are rarely encountered, colonic perforations are serious complications of colonoscopy. A high index of clinical suspicion is required for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Age, co-morbidities, the location and size of the perforation, and the time interval between onset and diagnosis should be evaluated, and the treatment approach should be planned accordingly.

Indexed as

colonoscopyColon perforationiatrogenic bowel perforation

Identifiers

PMID28944333
PMCPMC5602312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.