ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2017
The Ethics of Fertility Preservation for Pediatric Patients With Differences (Disorders) of Sex Development.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes in 45,X/46,XY mosaicism: a 30-year retrospective study in Hong Kong.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2026Article
- The Impact of Congenital Anomalies of the Male and Female Reproductive Organs on Infertility and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Fertility preservation in girls and adolescents with Turner syndrome: lessons for reproductive care in differences of sex development - a mini-review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Imagining and Preventing the Future Existence of Bodies with Variations in Sex Characteristics.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Fertility Discussions: Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults With Differences of Sex Development.Clinical practice in pediatric psychology · 2021Article
- A View from the past into our collective future: the oncofertility consortium vision statement.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Engineered reproductive tissues.Nature biomedical engineering · 2020Review
- Turner Syndrome with Y Chromosome: Spontaneous Thelarche, Menarche, and Risk of Malignancy.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2020Article
- A Management Protocol for Gonad Preservation in Patients with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2019Review
- Gonadal Tissue Cryopreservation for a Girl With Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2019Article
- The National Physicians Cooperative: transforming fertility management in the cancer setting and beyond.Future oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Disorders of sex development.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differences (disorders) of sex development are diverse conditions with variations in chromosomal, gonadal, and/or genital development. Fertility potential in this population is variable. Recent investigations into fertility potential in those previously thought to be infertile suggest that the majority may have fertility potential through experimental protocols. Fertility preservation may be more successful if pursued in childhood. As fertility research and techniques advance, it is important to carefully consider pediatric ethical issues specific to this population, including gonadectomy, consent/assent, experimental treatment and false hope, cost and insurance coverage, genetic transmission to offspring, and gender dysphoria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.