ArticleNPJ breast cancer2017
Video intervention increases participation of black breast cancer patients in therapeutic trials.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to increase racial and ethnic minority accrual into cancer clinical trials: A systematic review.Cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Use of Video Education Interventions to Increase Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2021Pooled it
- Exploring Racial Disparities in Awareness and Perceptions of Oncology Clinical Trials: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data From the mychoice Study.JMIR cancer · 2024Trial
- PPI in LifeMap-QUEST: an example of co-producing videos in different languages to support inclusion in a clinical study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- "We Don't Get Drugs Targeted for Us:" Applying the Integrated Behavioral Model to Understand Why Black Women Chose to Participate in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial.Health communication · 2025Article
- New strategies for enhancing enrollment of underrepresented minorities in lymphoma clinical trials.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Developing a supportive virtual human to deliver clinical trial education for older women and other populations historically excluded from research.Patient education and counseling · 2025Article
- Use of Digital Health Interventions for Cancer Prevention Among People Living With Disabilities in the United States: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Addressing Barriers and Facilitators to African Americans' and Hispanics' Participation in Clinical and Genomic Research Through a Bioethical Sensitive Video.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Article
- Strategies for increasing accrual in cancer clinical trials: What is the evidence?Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- Opportunities to Increase Science of Diversity and Inclusion in Clinical Trials: Equity and a Lack of a Control.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Review
- What's in it for me?: A value assessment of gynecologic cancer clinical trials for Black women.Gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Pilot Feasibility Study of a Video Intervention to Educate Patients with Breast Cancer About Clinical Trials.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Increasing Ancestral Diversity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Studies.Arthritis care & research · 2022Article
- Health Disparities in Recruitment and Enrollment in Research.Thoracic surgery clinics · 2022Review
- Landmark Cancer Clinical Trials and Real-World Patient Populations: Examining Race and Age Reporting.Cancers · 2021Article
- A pilot study of a culturally-appropriate, educational intervention to increase participation in cancer clinical trials among African Americans and Latinos.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Article
- African American participation in cancer clinical trials.Ecancermedicalscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a striking racial and ethnic disparity in incidence and mortality of cancer yet minorities remain markedly underrepresented in clinical trials. This pilot study set out to determine the impact of a 15-min culturally tailored educational video on three outcomes relating to clinical trials: likely participation, attitudes (assessed based on six barriers), and actual enrollment. Breast cancer patients with Stage I-III, if diagnosed within previous 6 months, or metastatic disease who self-identified as black or African American were invited to participate. The primary outcome measure was the decision to participate in a therapeutic clinical trial after the intervention. Patients' intention to enroll on a therapeutic clinical trial and the change in attitudes toward clinical trials were measured by the previously developed Attitudes and Intention to Enroll in Therapeutic Clinical Trials (AIET) questionnaire. Of the 200 patients that participated, 39 (19.5%) patients signed consent to participate in a therapeutic clinical trial; 27 (13.5%) patients enrolled, resulting in a 7.5% increase from our baseline comparison of 6% clinical trial enrollment rate in black cancer patients (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.