ArticleOncology letters2017
Value of the level of methylation of RASSF1A and WIF-1 in tissue and serum in neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic assessment for advanced breast cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2019Pooled it
- Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with liquid biopsies and multiparametric MRI in patients with breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Dkk1 as a Prognostic Marker for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2024Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA Is a Variant of Liquid Biopsy with Predictive and Prognostic Clinical Value in Breast Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Identification and validation of plasma biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer in South Asian women.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Dietary fat and obesity as modulators of breast cancer risk: Focus on DNA methylation.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Review
- The long non-coding RNAEpigenetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the clinical efficacy of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy TAC scheme in treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer, and the value of the level of Ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) gene methylation and the Wnt inhibitory factor (WIF)-1 gene in tissue and serum of patients in clinical outcome prediction. In total, 126 patients were consecutively selected to receive TAC scheme (docetaxel, pirarubicin/epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) for at least four cycles with the total effective rate. The incidence of complications, progression-free survival and survival rate were recorded. Tumor tissues and peripheral blood samples collected in this study was used to detect methylation positive rate of RASSF1A and WIF-1 by methylation-specific PCR method and the relative level of expression of RASSF1A and WIF-1 mRNA by reverse transcription PCR method. Of the 126 patients, there were 18 cases with complete response (CR), 32 cases with partial response (PR), 50 cases with stable disease (SD), and 26 cases with disease progression (PD) with a total effective rate of 79.37%. Comparison on baseline data of effective group and ineffective group showed no difference (P>0.05), and comparison on adverse reactions occurrence showed no difference (P>0.05). Progression-free survival of the effective group was prolonged with a significant increase in survival rate (P<0.05). Positive rates of RASSF1A methylation and WIF-1 in tissue and serum of the patients in the effective group were significantly lower than those in the ineffective group, but the mRNA of RASSF1A and WIF-mRNA was significantly higher than the ineffective group (P<0.05). The sensitivity of clinical outcome prediction using tissue RASSF1A methylation was 67.0%, the specificity 15.4%, positive predictive value 69.0% and negative predictive value 31.0%. The above-mentioned indexes of tissue WIF-1 were 76.0, 31.4, 72.2 and 27.8, respectively. The indexes of serum RASSF1A were 85.0, 50.0, 76.2 and 23.8%, respectively, and the indexes of serum WIF-1 were 94.0, 75.0, 81.0 and 19.0%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that the accuracy of clinical outcome prediction using tissue RASSF1A mRNA level was 0.812. The sensitivity 85.2%, the specificity 76.3% and the critical value 0.4256. These indexes of tissue WIF-1 were 0.833, 86.7%, 75.4% and 0.3562 for CR, PR, SD and PD, respectively. These indexes of serum RASSF1A were 0.864, 88.3%, 77.4% and 0.2564, respectively, and for serum WIF-1 were 0.882, 89.4%, 73.5% and 0.1562, respectively. In conclusion, the detection of RASSF1A and WIF-1 gene methylation and level of mRNA expression in tissue and serum of patients with locally advanced breast cancer has an important application value in predicting clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of the TAC scheme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.