ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
Evaluation of Safety in Exceeding Maximum Adult Doses of Commonly Used Second-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs in Pediatric Patients.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of the New Antiepileptic Drugs for Focal-Onset Seizures in Pediatrics: Role of Extrapolation.Paediatric drugs · 2018Review
- Safety of Supratherapeutic Doses of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs in Children: What Have We Really Learned?The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAGArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePediatric patients often require larger doses of antiepileptic drug (AED) than adults in order to attain therapeutic serum concentrations and/or achieve seizure control. Safety and efficacy data are often extrapolated from adult literature; hence, optimal dosage may only be determined anecdotally or based on expert opinion. With limited pediatric dosing guidelines, milligrams per day that are based on weight may exceed the maximum adult dose. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of exceeding maximum doses as specified by the US Food and Drug Administration or manufacturers of commonly used AEDs in pediatric patients.
methodsThis study is a single-center, retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients seen in the outpatient clinic between October 2010 and October 2014 who were prescribed a dose that exceeds the maximum approved dose of oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, topiramate, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, or clobazam. Baseline demographics (ie, sex, age, race/ethnicity, weight, height, diagnosis), serum drug concentrations, and appropriate laboratory tests were collected. Side effects were reviewed.
resultsDuring the 4-year study period, 41,137 prescriptions were included. A total of 2% of prescriptions exceeded the maximum dose of 1 of the included AEDs. The most common AED prescribed above the maximum dose was levetiracetam (53%), whereas lamotrigine was the least common (6%). The largest doses prescribed exceeded the maximum by 3-fold (i.e., levetiracetam dose of 9000 mg/day).
conclusionIt appears safe to use doses exceeding the maximum approved dose of the evaluated AEDs in pediatric patients, with appropriate counseling and monitoring for adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.