ArticleMolecular vision2017
Article in Molecular vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Major phenolic compounds in Korean red pine (Food science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Investigation of protective effect of carvacrol in an experimental cataract model.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Anti-Amnesia-like Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Quantitative Changes of Phenolic Compounds in Pine Twigs by Variety, Harvest Season, and Growing Region.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2022Article
- Korean Red Pine (Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Natural Antioxidant Activities of Plants in Preventing Cataractogenesis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Current Trends in the Pharmacotherapy of Cataracts.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Rosmarinic and Sinapic Acids May Increase the Content of Reduced Glutathione in the Lenses of Estrogen-Deficient Rats.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Polyphenol-enriched fraction ofMolecular vision · 2019Article
- Hepaprotective Effect of StandardizedBiomolecules & therapeutics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRat pups treated with sodium selenite are typically used as an in vivo model to mimic age-related nuclear cataract. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, lipid peroxidation, reduction of antioxidant enzymes, crystalline proteolysis, and apoptosis are considered factors that contribute to pathogenesis of age-related nuclear cataract. In the present study, we investigated whether
methodsSprague Dawley rats were divided into six groups (n=10). Group 1 rat pups (the control) were treated with only normal saline. The rat pups in groups 2 to 6 were given a subcutaneous injection with sodium selenite (18 μmol/kg bodyweight) on postnatal (P) day 10. Group 3 rat pups (the positive control) were given gastric intubation with curcumin (80 mg/kg bodyweight) on P9, P10, and P11. The rat pups in groups 4 to 6 were given gastric intubation with
resultsThis study showed that
conclusionsThese results suggested that
Indexed as
Identifiers
28943754PMC5602326W2761347865What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.