Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28943741›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering2017

Scalable Iterative Classification for Sanitizing Large-Scale Datasets.

Bo Li, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Muqun Li, Bradley Malin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Missing value replacement in strings and applications.Data mining and knowledge discovery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scalable Iterative Classification for Sanitizing Large-Scale Datasets.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bo LiVanderbilt University.
Yevgeniy VorobeychikVanderbilt University.
Muqun LiVanderbilt University.
Bradley MalinVanderbilt University.

Funding

eMERGE Coordinating Center - Administrative SupplementU01HG006385 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS, PAUL A. · 2011 to 2014
$5.4M
A Risk Management Framework for Identifiability in Genomics ResearchR01HG006844 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALIN, BRADLEY A. · 2012 to 2019
$2.4M
Technologies to Enable Privacy in Biomedical DatabanksR01LM009989 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALIN, BRADLEY A. · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
Scalable and Robust Clinical Text De-Identification ToolsR01LM011366 · NLM · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI CARRELL, DAVID S. · 2012 to 2014
$827k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006844NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006385NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009989NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cheap ubiquitous computing enables the collection of massive amounts of personal data in a wide variety of domains. Many organizations aim to share such data while obscuring features that could disclose personally identifiable information. Much of this data exhibits weak structure (e.g., text), such that machine learning approaches have been developed to detect and remove identifiers from it. While learning is never perfect, and relying on such approaches to sanitize data can leak sensitive information, a small risk is often acceptable. Our goal is to balance the value of published data and the risk of an adversary discovering leaked identifiers. We model data sanitization as a game between 1) a publisher who chooses a set of classifiers to apply to data and publishes only instances predicted as non-sensitive and 2) an attacker who combines machine learning and manual inspection to uncover leaked identifying information. We introduce a fast iterative greedy algorithm for the publisher that ensures a low utility for a resource-limited adversary. Moreover, using five text data sets we illustrate that our algorithm leaves virtually no automatically identifiable sensitive instances for a state-of-the-art learning algorithm, while sharing over 93% of the original data, and completes after at most 5 iterations.

Indexed as

game theoryPrivacy preservingweak structured data sanitization

Identifiers

PMID28943741
PMCPMC5607782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.