Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28943589›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2017

Should the Selective Arterial Secretagogue Injection Test for Insulinoma Localization Be Evaluated at 60 or 120 Seconds?

Keijiro Ueda, Tetsuhide Ito, Ken Kawabe, Lingaku Lee, Takashi Fujiyama, Yuichi Tachibana, Masami Miki, Kohei Yasunaga, Takehiro Takaoka, Akihiro Nishie and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keijiro UedaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Tetsuhide ItoDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Ken KawabeDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Lingaku LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Japan.
Takashi FujiyamaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Yuichi TachibanaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Masami MikiDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Kohei YasunagaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Takehiro TakaokaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Akihiro NishieDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Yoshiki AsayamaDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Robert T JensenDigestive Diseases Branch, National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, USA.
Yoshihiro OgawaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPKyushu Rosai Hospital · JPNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The selective arterial secretagogue injection (SASI) test is considered indispensable for the accurate localization of insulinoma. However, the optimum timing of the post-injection evaluation is controversial, as some studies recommend 60 seconds [SASI (60 seconds)] while others support 120 seconds [SASI (120 seconds)]. The aim of this study was to determine the optimum timing for the SASI test evaluation for insulinoma localization. Methods Thirteen patients with surgically proven insulinoma were studied retrospectively. For the SASI test, immunoreactive insulin (IRI) was determined at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 seconds after calcium gluconate injection. A two-fold or greater increase in IRI over the baseline value was considered positive. The localization abilities of SASI (60 seconds) and SASI (120 seconds) were then compared. Results In 13 patients, a secretagogue was injected into 40 arteries supplying the pancreas. In the SASI (60 seconds) and SASI (120 seconds), the respective findings were as follows: positive predictive value, 72.2% and 68.2%; false positive rate, 25.0% and 35.0%; and rate of positivity in the head and body/tail, 38.5% and 46.2%. When the artery with the largest change was taken as the dominant artery, the localization detection sensitivity was 76.9% for SASI (60 seconds) and 92.3% for SASI (120 seconds). The sensitivity of morphological imaging techniques for localization ranged from 61.5-91.7%. Conclusion Compared with SASI (60 seconds) or morphological imaging, the insulinoma localization ability of SASI (120 seconds) was superior. Given these findings, we believe that the IRI level should be measured at 120 seconds in the SASI test.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCalcium GluconateFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialInsulinomaMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsYoung AdultCalcium Gluconatearterial stimulation and venous samplinginsulinomalocalizationoptimum timingselective arterial secretagogue injection test

Identifiers

PMID28943589
PMCPMC5725851
OpenAlexW2758325748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.