Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28943229›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2017

A Parallel Comparison of Antigen Candidates for Development of an Optimized Serological Diagnosis of Schistosomiasis Japonica in the Philippines.

Pengfei Cai, Kosala G Weerakoon, Yi Mu, David U Olveda, Xianyu Piao, Shuai Liu, Remigio M Olveda, Qijun Chen, Allen G Ross, Donald P McManus

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Journal of immunology research · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Serum Exosomal miRNAs for Grading Hepatic Fibrosis Due to Schistosomiasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pengfei CaiMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: Pengfei.Cai@qimrberghofer.edu.au.
Kosala G WeerakoonMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia.
Yi MuMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia.
David U OlvedaMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Xianyu PiaoMOH Key Laboratory of Systems Biology of Pathogens, Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Shuai LiuMOH Key Laboratory of Systems Biology of Pathogens, Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Remigio M OlvedaResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine, Department of Health, Manila, Philippines.
Qijun ChenKey Laboratory of Zoonosis, Shangyang Agricultural University, Shengyang, PR China.
Allen G RossMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Donald P McManusMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: Don.McManus@qimrberghofer.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schistosoma japonicum is stubbornly persistent in China and the Philippines. Fast and accurate diagnostic tools are required to monitor effective control measures against schistosomiasis japonica. Promising antigen candidates for the serological diagnosis of schistosomiasis japonica have generally been identified from the Chinese strain of S. japonicum. However, the Chinese (SjC) and Philippine (SjP) strains of S. japonicum express a number of clear phenotypic differences, including aspects of host immune responses. This feature thereby emphasized the requirement to determine whether antigens identified as having diagnostic value for SjC infection are also suitable for the diagnosis of SjP infection. In the current study, 10 antigens were selected for comparison of diagnostic performance of the SjP infection using ELISA. On testing of sera from 180 subjects in the Philippines, SjSAP4 exhibited the best diagnostic performance with 94.03% sensitivity and 98.33% specificity using an optimized serum dilution. In another large scale testing with 412 serum samples, a combination (SjSAP4+Sj23-LHD (large hydrophilic domain)) provided the best diagnostic outcome with 87.04% sensitivity and 96.67% specificity. This combination could be used in future for serological diagnosis of schistosomiasis in the Philippines, thereby representing an important component for monitoring integrated control measures.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, HelminthEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMicePhilippinesSchistosoma japonicumSchistosomiasis japonicaSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, HelminthPhilippine strainSchistosoma japonicumSchistosomiasisSerological diagnosisSj23-LHDSjSAP4

Identifiers

PMID28943229
PMCPMC5652020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.