Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28943075›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2017

A Novel Absorbable Radiopaque Hydrogel Spacer to Separate the Head of the Pancreas and Duodenum in Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.

Avani D Rao, Ziwei Feng, Eun Ji Shin, Jin He, Kevin M Waters, Stephanie Coquia, Robert DeJong, Lauren M Rosati, Lin Su, Dengwang Li and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. EUS-guided hydrogel microparticle injection in a cadaveric model.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Avani D RaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ziwei FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Eun Ji ShinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jin HeDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kevin M WatersThe Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stephanie CoquiaDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Robert DeJongDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lauren M RosatiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lin SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Dengwang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Juan JacksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stephen ClarkDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jeffrey SchultzDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Danielle HutchingsThe Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Seong-Hun KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ralph H HrubanThe Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Theodore L DeWeeseDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
John WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amol NarangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Joseph M HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kai DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: kding1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LENNON, ANNE MARIE · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe assessed the feasibility and theoretical dosimetric advantages of an injectable hydrogel to increase the space between the head of the pancreas (HOP) and duodenum in a human cadaveric model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using 3 human cadaveric specimens, an absorbable radiopaque hydrogel was injected between the HOP and duodenum by way of open laparotomy in 1 case and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance in 2 cases. The cadavers were subsequently imaged using computed tomography and dissected for histologic confirmation of hydrogel placement. The duodenal dose reduction and planning target volume (PTV) coverage were characterized using pre- and postspacer injection stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans for the 2 cadavers with EUS-guided placement, the delivery method that appeared the most clinically desirable. Modeling studies were performed using 60 SBRT plans consisting of 10 previously treated patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, each with 6 different HOP-duodenum separation distances. The duodenal volume receiving 15 Gy (V15), 20 Gy (V20), and 33 Gy (V33) was assessed for each iteration.

resultsIn the 3 cadaveric studies, an average of 0.9 cm, 1.1 cm, and 0.9 cm HOP-duodenum separation was achieved. In the 2 EUS cases, the V20 decreased from 3.86 cm

conclusionsCurrently, dose escalation has been limited owing to radiosensitive structures adjacent to the pancreas. We demonstrated the feasibility of hydrogel separation of the HOP and duodenum. Future studies will evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique with the potential for more effective dose escalation using SBRT or intensity-modulated radiation therapy to improve the outcomes in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

DuodenumOrgans at RiskPancreasCadaverFeasibility StudiesHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesUltrasonography, InterventionalHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID28943075
PMCPMC5699940
OpenAlexW2748131247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.