GuidelineJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2017
Representation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the AHA / ACC guidelines.
Guideline in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05346094 (A Multicenter Investigation of Cardiac Normal Values of Morphology, Function and Tissue Characteristics by Magnetic Resonance Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Investigation of Cardiac Normal Values of Morphology, Function and Tissue Characteristics by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy management: a systematic review of the clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Pooled it
- Head-to-Head Comparison and Temporal Trends of Cardiac MRI Recommendations in ESC versus ACC/AHA Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Pooled it
- The Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A comparison of vendor artificial intelligence solutions for automated post-processing of short-axis cine images in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Cardiac left ventricular MRI texture analysis to derive texture characteristics of a healthy population: clinical implications.European radiology · 2026Article
- Improving Patient Access and Scanning Efficiency in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Quadricuspid vs Bicuspid Aortic Valve.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Effects of parametric feature maps on the reproducibility of radiomics from different fields of view in cardiac magnetic resonance cine images- a clinical and experimental study setting.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Measuring biventricular function and left atrial volume in a single five-dimensional whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance scan at 0.55T.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- Cardiac digital twins at scale from MRI: Open tools and representative models from ~ 55000 UK Biobank participants.PloS one · 2025Article
- Cardiac Cine MRI Using a Commercially Available 0.55-T Scanner.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Motion correction and super-resolution for multi-slice cardiac magnetic resonance imaging via an end-to-end deep learning approach.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2024Article
- CardSegNet: An adaptive hybrid CNN-vision transformer model for heart region segmentation in cardiac MRI.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Cardiac MRI at Low Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Review
- Regional variability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance access and utilization in the United States.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Observational
- The Nottingham Ischaemic Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance resource (NotIs CMR): a prospective paired clinical and imaging scar database-protocol.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- An artificial intelligence tool for automated analysis of large-scale unstructured clinical cine cardiac magnetic resonance databases.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Article
- Granulomatous inflammation mimicking a hematoma around the replaced ascending aorta in magnetic resonance imaging: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Self-Attention MHDNet: A Novel Deep Learning Model for the Detection of R-Peaks in the Electrocardiogram Signals Corrupted with Magnetohydrodynamic Effect.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhereas evidence supporting the diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has increased, there exists significant worldwide variability in the clinical utilization of CMR. A recent study demonstrated that CMR is represented in the majority of European Society for Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, with a large number of specific recommendations in particular regarding coronary artery disease. To further investigate the gap between the evidence and clinical use of CMR, this study analyzed the role of CMR in the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA).
methodsTwenty-four AHA/ACC original guidelines, updates and new editions, published between 2006 and 2017, were screened for the terms "magnetic", "MRI", "CMR", "MR" and "imaging". Non-cardiovascular MR examinations were excluded. All CMR-related paragraphs and specific recommendations for CMR including the level of evidence (A, B, C) and the class of recommendation (I, IIa, IIb, III) were extracted.
resultsTwelve of the 24 guidelines (50.0%) contain specific recommendations regarding CMR. Four guidelines (16.7%) mention CMR in the text only, and 8 (33.3%) do not mention CMR. The 12 guidelines with recommendations for CMR contain in total 65 specific recommendations (31 class-I, 23 class-IIa, 6 class-IIb, 5 class-III). Most recommendations have evidence level C (44/65; 67.7%), followed by level B (21/65; 32.3%). There are no level A recommendations. 22/65 recommendations refer to vascular imaging, 17 to congenital heart disease, 8 to cardiomyopathies, 8 to myocardial stress testing, 5 to left and right ventricular function, 3 to viability, and 2 to valvular heart disease.
conclusionsCMR is represented in two thirds of the AHA/ACC guidelines, which contain a number of specific recommendations for the use of CMR. In a simplified comparison with the ESC guidelines, CMR is less represented in the AHA/ACC guidelines in particular in the field of coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.