Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28942591›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

A novel vaporization-enucleation technique for benign prostate hyperplasia using 120-W HPS GreenLight™ laser: Seoul technique II in comparison with vaporization and previously reported modified vaporization-resection technique.

Sangjun Yoo, Juhyun Park, Sung Yong Cho, Min Chul Cho, Hyeon Jeong, Hwancheol Son

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sangjun YooDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Sindaebang 2(i)-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Korea.
Juhyun ParkDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Sindaebang 2(i)-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Korea.
Sung Yong ChoDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Sindaebang 2(i)-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Korea.
Min Chul ChoDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Sindaebang 2(i)-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Korea.
Hyeon JeongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Sindaebang 2(i)-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Korea.
Hwancheol SonDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Sindaebang 2(i)-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Korea. volley@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe developed a novel vaporization-enucleation technique (Seoul II), which consists of vaporization-enucleation of the prostate using 120-W HPS GreenLight laser, and enucleated prostate resection using bipolar devices for tissue removal. We compared the outcomes of the Seoul II with vaporization and a previously reported modified vaporization-resection technique (Seoul I).

methodsAmong patients with benign prostate hyperplasia who underwent transurethral surgery using GreenLight laser at our institute, 347 patients with prostate volume ≥ 40 ml were included. The impact of surgical techniques on efficacy and postoperative functional outcomes was compared.

resultsNo difference was found in baseline characteristics, although the prostate volume was marginally greater in Seoul II (p = 0.051). Prostate volume reduction per operation time (p < 0.001) and lasing time (p = 0.016) were greater in Seoul II. At postoperative 12 months, the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) was lower (p = 0.011), and the decrement in I-PSS was greater in Seoul II (p = 0.001) than other techniques. In multivariate analysis, postoperative 12-month I-PSS for Seoul II was significantly superior to vaporization (p < 0.001), although it was similar to Seoul I. The maintenance of immediate postoperative I-PSS decrement, until postoperative 12 months was superior in Seoul II compared with vaporization (p = 0.014) and Seoul I (p = 0.048).

conclusionsSeoul II showed improved efficacy and voiding functional maintenance over postoperative 12 months in patients with prostate volume ≥ 40 ml compared with vaporization and Seoul I. This technique could be easily accepted by clinicians who are familiar with GreenLight lasers and add flexibility to surgery without additional equipment.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateAgedHumansLasers, Solid-StateMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeOrgan SizeProstateRecovery of FunctionRepublic of KoreaTreatment OutcomeLasersProstatic hyperplasiaTransurethral resection of prostate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.