Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28942590›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2017

Conservative Treatment of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.

S T van Dijk, S J Rottier, A A W van Geloven, M A Boermeester

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03496090 (Randomized Multicentric Controlled Clinical Trial of Parallel Groups to Evaluate the Non-therapeutic Inferiority of a Free Diet With a Progressive Diet, in the Treatment of Non-complicated Acute Diverticulitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03496090 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Multicentric Controlled Clinical Trial of Parallel Groups to Evaluate the Non-therapeutic Inferiority of a Free Diet With a Progressive Diet, in the Treatment of Non-complicated Acute Diverticulitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Universitario Reina Sofía de MurciaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled134ConditionsDiverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis, Diverticulitis, Colonic, Uncomplicated Diverticular DiseaseArmsFree diet, Progressive diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S T van DijkDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9 1100 DD, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S J RottierDepartment of Surgery, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
A A W van GelovenDepartment of Surgery, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
M A BoermeesterDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9 1100 DD, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.a.boermeester@amc.nl.
Academic Medical Center · NLTergooi · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSince the treatment of acute diverticulitis has become more conservative over the last years, knowledge of conservative treatment strategies is increasingly important. RECENT

findingsSeveral treatment strategies that previously have been imposed as routine treatment are now obsolete. Uncomplicated diverticulitis patients can be treated without antibiotics, without bed rest, and without dietary restrictions; and a selected group of patients can be treated as outpatients. Also, patients with isolated pericolic extraluminal air can be treated conservatively as well. Whereas some patient subgroups have been suggested to suffer from a more virulent disease course or higher recurrence rates, current evidence does not support all traditional understandings. Patients on immunosuppression or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs seem to have a higher risk of complicated diverticulitis, but young patients do not. Data on the risk of recurrent diverticulitis in young patients is conflicting but the risk seems comparable to elderly patients. Besides the traditional treatments, several new treatment strategies have emerged but have failed thus far. Mesalazine does not have any beneficial effect on preventing recurrent diverticulitis based on current literature. Rifaximin and probiotics have been studied insufficiently in acute diverticulitis patients to conclude on their efficacy. This review provides an overview of recent developments in conservative treatment strategies of acute diverticulitis and discusses the latest evidence on patient subgroups that have been suggested to suffer from an aberrant disease course.

Indexed as

Acute diverticulitisAntibioticsConservative treatmentUncomplicated

Identifiers

PMID28942590
PMCPMC5610668
OpenAlexW2757417964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.