Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28942119›Full record

ReviewPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2018

21st century neurobehavioral theories of decision making in addiction: Review and evaluation.

Warren K Bickel, Alexandra M Mellis, Sarah E Snider, Liqa N Athamneh, Jeffrey S Stein, Derek A Pope

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Warren K BickelAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States; Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Roanoke, VA, United States; Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States; Faculty of Health Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: wkbickel@vtc.vt.edu.
Alexandra M MellisAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States; Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Sarah E SniderAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Liqa N AthamnehAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States; Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Jeffrey S SteinAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Derek A PopeAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Virginia Tech · USCarilion Clinic · US

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI LEVY, DAVID THEODORE · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
Neurobehavioral Determinants of Health Risk Behaviors: From Adolescence to Young AdulthoodR01DA036017 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI CASAS, BROOKS, KIM-SPOON, JUNGMEEN · 2013 to 2022
$7.2M
Inter-Temporal Trade-offs in the Risky Decisions of Cocaine AddictsR01DA030241 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, MONTAGUE, P READ · 2010 to 2014
$3.6M
Self-Control Improvement Intervention (SCII): Improving Abstinence in SmokersR01DA034755 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
The Repair of Self Control in Alcohol Dependence: Working Memory & Real Time fMRIR01AA021529 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, LACONTE, STEPHEN M · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
Delay discounting as a target for self-regulation in prediabetesUH2DK109543 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2015 to 2017
$2.4M
Mentorship and Development Program for Biomedical TraineesDP7OD018428 · OD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI FRIEDLANDER, MICHAEL J · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
The Social Interactome of Recovery: Social Media as Therapy DevelopmentR01DA039456 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K · 2014 to 2016
$1.7M
Abuse liability of reduced nicotine content cigarettes within a complex tobacco marketplaceR01DA042535 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, KOFFARNUS, MIKHAIL NIKOLAAS · 2016 to 2018
$1.5M
Reducing socioeconomic disparities in tobacco dependence treatment outcomesR01MD007054 · NIMHD · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI SHEFFER, CHRISTINE ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
Neural Correlates of Choices for Impulsive HIV-risk Behavior in Stimulant DependenceR21DA040559 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI KOFFARNUS, MIKHAIL NIKOLAAS · 2015 to 2016
$456k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512NCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021529NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA023605NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034755NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036017NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039456NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042535NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040559NIDDK NIH HHS UH2 DK109543NIH HHS DP7 OD018428NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review critically examines neurobehavioral theoretical developments in decision making in addiction in the 21st century. We specifically compare each theory reviewed to seven benchmarks of theoretical robustness, based on their ability to address: why some commodities are addictive; developmental trends in addiction; addiction-related anhedonia; self-defeating patterns of behavior in addiction; why addiction co-occurs with other unhealthy behaviors; and, finally, means for the repair of addiction. We have included only self-contained theories or hypotheses which have been developed or extended in the 21st century to address decision making in addiction. We thus review seven distinct theories of decision making in addiction: learning theories, incentive-sensitization theory, dopamine imbalance and systems models, opponent process theory, strength models of self-control failure, the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory, and the triadic systems theory of addiction. Finally, we have directly compared the performance of each of these theories based on the aforementioned benchmarks, and highlighted key points at which several theories have coalesced.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAnhedoniaAnimalsDopamineHealth BehaviorHistory, 21st CenturyHumansModels, PsychologicalSubstance-Related DisordersDopamineAddictionDecision makingHumanNeurobehavioralTheory

Identifiers

PMID28942119
PMCPMC5747999
OpenAlexW2758629277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.