ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2017
Exploiting homing abilities of cell carriers: Targeted delivery of nanoparticles for cancer therapy.
Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Nanotechnology: Revolutionizing Therapeutic Strategies Against Drug-Resistant Breast Cancer.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Macrophage-Based Nanoplatforms for Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery and Cancer Immunomodulation: Extracellular Vesicles, Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles, and Live Cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Smart Cells Against Cancer: Advances in Cell-Based Drug Delivery and Diagnostics.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Interactions Between Active Matters and Endogenous Fields.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Liposome-Loaded Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Tumor Accumulation and Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Doxorubicin in Mouse Tumor Models of Melanoma.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Advances in nanotechnology-based approaches for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Investigating the In Vivo Biodistribution of Extracellular Vesicles Isolated from Various Human Cell Sources Using Positron Emission Tomography.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Cell-Based Drug Delivery Systems with Innate Homing Capability as a Novel Nanocarrier Platform.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A nano-enhanced vaccine for metastatic melanoma immunotherapy.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022Article
- A Critical Scrutiny on Liposomal Nanoparticles Drug Carriers as Modelled by Topotecan Encapsulation and Release in Treating Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Engineered macrophages as near-infrared light activated drug vectors for chemo-photodynamic therapy of primary and bone metastatic breast cancer.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Engineering MacrophagesFrontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- F7 and topotecan co-loaded thermosensitive liposome as a nano-drug delivery system for tumor hyperthermia.Drug delivery · 2020Article
- Surgery-Guided Removal of Ovarian Cancer Using Up-Converting Nanoparticles.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2020Article
- Aptamers against mouse and human tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells as reagents for targeted chemotherapy.Science translational medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Off target toxicities is one of the hallmarks of conventional chemotherapy as only a tiny percentage of the injected dose actually reaches the tumor(s). Numerous strategies have been employed in attempts to achieve targeted therapeutic delivery to tumors. One strategy that has received immense attention has been the packaging of these chemotherapeutics into nanoparticles and relying on the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect for targeting. However, few, if any, nanoformulations have been used clinically that actually show enhanced drug delivery to tumors. There are a number of biological barriers to successful targeted delivery and nanoparticles large enough to theoretically benefit from the EPR effect predominantly accumulate in the liver and spleen after systemic administration. Nanoparticles that do reach the tumor will experience challenges such as difficulty penetrating deeply into tumors and rapid uptake by macrophages rather than tumor cells. In order to overcome this, researchers are investigating a new drug delivery system by utilizing T-cells, macrophages, or stem cells (Mesenchymal/Neural Stem Cells) and loading them with therapeutic nanoparticles for targeted delivery due to either their organotropic or tumor tropic migratory capabilities. By exploiting the migration and motility of these particular cells, researchers have delivered drug-loaded nanoparticles as well as nanoparticles for use in thermal ablation and magnetic field treatments, with the goals of decreasing off-target toxicities and increasing intratumoral distribution of the therapeutic payload. This is an inherently complex drug delivery system that requires optimization of multiple parameters - including cell type, payload, cell loading, release rate from nanoparticle and more - for success. Here we review recent advances and upcoming challenges for the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.