Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28941189›Full record

Trial reportArthritis care & research2018

Efficacy of a Work Disability Prevention Program for People with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Single-Blind Parallel-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Julie J Keysor, Michael P LaValley, Carrie Brown, David T Felson, Rawan A AlHeresh, Molly W Vaughan, Robert Yood, John I Reed, Saralynn J Allaire

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis care & research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie J KeysorBoston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael P LaValleyBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8488-5170
Carrie BrownBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
David T FelsonBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, and the National Institute for Health Research Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester National Health Service Foundation Trust, and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Rawan A AlHereshMassachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions, Boston.
Molly W VaughanRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Robert YoodUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Saint Vincent Hospital, and Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, Massachusetts.
John I ReedUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Saint Vincent Hospital, and Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Saralynn J AllaireBoston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · USNational Health Service · GBRTI International · US

Funding

WORK DISABILITY-- PERSONS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISP60AR047785 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI NEOGI, TUHINA · 2001 to 2016
$18.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR047785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWork disability rates are high among people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions. Effective disability preventive programs are needed. We examined the efficacy of a modified vocational rehabilitation approach delivered by trained occupational therapists and physical therapists on work limitation and work loss over 2 years among people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions.

methodsEligibility criteria for this single-blind, parallel-arm randomized trial included ages 21-65 years, 15 or more hours/week employment, a self-reported doctor-diagnosed rheumatic or musculoskeletal condition, and concern about staying employed. The intervention consisted of a 1.5-hour meeting, an action plan, written materials on employment supports, and telephone calls at 3 weeks and 3 months. Control group participants received the written materials. The primary outcome was the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) output job demand subscale. The secondary outcome was work loss. Intent-to-treat analyses were performed.

resultsBetween October 2011 and January 2014, 652 individuals were assessed for eligibility. A total of 287 participants were randomized: 143 intervention and 144 control participants. In total, 264 participants (92%) completed 2-year data collection. There was no difference in the mean ± SD WLQ change scores from baseline to 2-year followup (-8.6 ± 1.9 intervention versus -8.3 ± 2.2 control; P = 0.93). Of the 36 participants who experienced permanent work loss at 2 years, 11 (8%) were intervention participants and 25 (18%) control participants (P = 0.03).

conclusionThe intervention did not have an effect on work limitations but reduced work loss. The intervention can be delivered by trained rehabilitation therapists.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismPersons with DisabilitiesWorkplaceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational ExposureRheumatic DiseasesSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28941189
PMCPMC6374024
OpenAlexW2758842377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.