ArticleBJU international2018
Increased accuracy of a novel mRNA-based urine test for bladder cancer surveillance.
Article in BJU international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Xpert bladder cancer detection and monitor in urothelial carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer diagnosis and NMIBC follow-up: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2023Pooled it
- Current status of genetic urinary biomarkers for surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.BMC urology · 2020Pooled it
- Circulating Tumor Function: A Systems Biology Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Genitourinary Cancers.Genes · 2026Review
- Urinary Biomarkers and Their Role in the Management of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Urine-Based Approaches for Screening, Diagnosis, and Surveillance of Urothelial Carcinoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Performance of GeneXpert BC as a Triage Test for Patients Presenting with Macroscopic Hematuria Suspicious for Urinary Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Urine scRNAseq reveals new insights into the bladder tumor immune microenvironment.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Urinary mRNA-based biomarkers for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- KRT13 and UPK1B for differential diagnosis between metastatic lung carcinoma from oral squamous cell carcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Xpert bladder cancer monitor to predict the need for a second TURB (MoniTURB trial).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Liquid Biopsies: Emerging role and clinical applications in solid tumours.Translational oncology · 2023Article
- Bladder Epicheck Test: A Novel Tool to Support Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis in Urine Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Bladder cancer detection in patients with neurogenic bladder: are cystoscopy and cytology effective, and are biomarkers pertinent as future diagnostic tools? A scoping review.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy for Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Review
- Article
- Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor May Avoid Cystoscopies in Patients Under "Active Surveillance" for Recurrent Bladder Cancer (BIAS Project): Longitudinal Cohort Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert Bladder Cancer (BC) Monitor, compared with cystoscopy and cytology in the oncological follow-up of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 140 patients with a history of NMIBC undergoing routine surveillance at our institution were enrolled prospectively in this study (ISRCTN study registry number 37210907). Urine cytology was evaluated according to the Paris classification system. In addition, urinary specimens were analysed using the Xpert BC Monitor, which measures five target mRNAs (ABL1, CRH, IGF2, UPK1B, ANXA10) using real-time PCR. Descriptive analysis, diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), receiver-operating characteristic curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.
resultsThe overall sensitivity (0.84) and NPV (0.93) of the Xpert BC Monitor were significantly superior to those of bladder washing cytology (0.33 and 0.76; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed the high sensitivity of the Xpert BC Monitor even in low-grade (0.77) and pTa (0.82) disease compared with barbotage cytology (low-grade: 0.13; pTa: 0.21). The overall specificity of the Xpert BC Monitor and barbotage cytology was similar (0.91 vs 0.94; P = 0.41). Combining the Xpert BC Monitor with barbotage cytology (AUC = 0.85) did not enhance diagnostic performance compared with the performance of the Xpert BC Monitor alone (AUC = 0.87).
conclusionIn this study, we report for the first time that the Xpert BC Monitor, a new mRNA-based urine test, outperforms cytology with regard to sensitivity and NPV, even in low-grade and pTa tumours, with no reduction of specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28941000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.