Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28941000›Full record

ArticleBJU international2018

Increased accuracy of a novel mRNA-based urine test for bladder cancer surveillance.

Renate Pichler, Josef Fritz, Gennadi Tulchiner, Gerald Klinglmair, Afschin Soleiman, Wolfgang Horninger, Helmut Klocker, Isabel Heidegger

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renate PichlerDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Josef FritzDepartment of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gennadi TulchinerDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gerald KlinglmairDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Afschin SoleimanClinical Pathology and Cytodiagnostics, Tyrolean State Hospitals Ltd, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolfgang HorningerDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Helmut KlockerDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Isabel HeideggerDepartment of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert Bladder Cancer (BC) Monitor, compared with cystoscopy and cytology in the oncological follow-up of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 140 patients with a history of NMIBC undergoing routine surveillance at our institution were enrolled prospectively in this study (ISRCTN study registry number 37210907). Urine cytology was evaluated according to the Paris classification system. In addition, urinary specimens were analysed using the Xpert BC Monitor, which measures five target mRNAs (ABL1, CRH, IGF2, UPK1B, ANXA10) using real-time PCR. Descriptive analysis, diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), receiver-operating characteristic curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.

resultsThe overall sensitivity (0.84) and NPV (0.93) of the Xpert BC Monitor were significantly superior to those of bladder washing cytology (0.33 and 0.76; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed the high sensitivity of the Xpert BC Monitor even in low-grade (0.77) and pTa (0.82) disease compared with barbotage cytology (low-grade: 0.13; pTa: 0.21). The overall specificity of the Xpert BC Monitor and barbotage cytology was similar (0.91 vs 0.94; P = 0.41). Combining the Xpert BC Monitor with barbotage cytology (AUC = 0.85) did not enhance diagnostic performance compared with the performance of the Xpert BC Monitor alone (AUC = 0.87).

conclusionIn this study, we report for the first time that the Xpert BC Monitor, a new mRNA-based urine test, outperforms cytology with regard to sensitivity and NPV, even in low-grade and pTa tumours, with no reduction of specificity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellCystoscopyCytodiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Messenger#BladderCancer#blcsmfollow-upmRNA-based markersrecurrencesurveillanceurine markers

Identifiers

PMID28941000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.