ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2017
Fetal head position and perineal distension associated with the use of the BD Odon Device™ in operative vaginal birth: a simulation study.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vacuum 5-step technique versus OdonAssist: Which is easier to learn for professionals without experience in assisted vaginal births? A simulation study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Outcomes of the novel Odon Device in indicated operative vaginal birth.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Trial
- Odon device for instrumental vaginal deliveries: results of a medical device pilot clinical study.Reproductive health · 2018Trial
- Feasibility of the OdonAssist device for assisted vaginal birth in a low-resource setting: ASSIST Ethiopia study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- How to optimise the use of innovative invasive devices: considerations for feasibility studies.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- The Odon Device™ for assisted vaginal birth: a feasibility study to investigate safety and efficacy-The ASSIST II study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2021Article
- The ASSIST Study - The BD Odon Device for assisted vaginal birth: a safety and feasibility study.Trials · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate (1) the placement of the BD Odon Device on the model fetal head and (2) perineal distention during simulated operative vaginal births conducted with the BD Odon Device.
designObservational simulation study.
settingNorth Bristol NHS Trust, UK. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Four hundred and forty simulated operative vaginal births.
methodsThree bespoke fetal mannequins were developed to represent (1) bi-parietal diameter of the 50th centile at term, (2) bi-parietal diameter at the 5th centile at term, and (3) 50th centile head with 2 cm of caput. Siting of the BD Odon Device on model heads was determined before and after 400 simulated operative vaginal births. Variables were analysed to determine their effect on device siting and movement during birth. The fetal mannequins were placed inside a maternal mannequin and the BD Odon Device was placed around the fetal head as per the instructions for use. The location of the air cuff was determined before and after the head was delivered. Perineal distension was determined by recording maximum perineal distention during a simulated operative vaginal birth using the same procedure, as well as scenarios employing an inappropriately non-deflated air cuff (for the BD Odon Device), the Kiwi ventouse and non-rotational forceps.
main outcome measuresSite and displacement during birth of the BD Odon Device on a model head. Maximal perineal distension during birth.
resultsThe BD Odon Device was reliably sited in a standard over the fetal head position (approximately 40 mm above the fetal chin) for all stations, head sizes and positions with no significant displacement. In occipito-posterior births, compared with occipito-anterior or transverse, the BD Odon Device routinely sited further down the fetal head (toward the chin). The BD Odon Device was not associated with more perineal distension compared with forceps or Kiwi ventouse (respectively 21, 26 and 21 mm at posterior fourchette).
conclusionsThe BD Odon Device reliably sited over a safe area of the fetal head in 400 simulated births representative of clinical practice. The BD Odon Device generates similar levels of perineal distension compared with Kiwi ventouse when used correctly. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Location of the BD Odon Device on a fetal head in simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.