Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940873›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2017

Fetal head position and perineal distension associated with the use of the BD Odon Device™ in operative vaginal birth: a simulation study.

S M O'Brien, C Winter, C A Burden, M Boulvain, T J Draycott, J F Crofts

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vacuum 5-step technique versus OdonAssist: Which is easier to learn for professionals without experience in assisted vaginal births? A simulation study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Outcomes of the novel Odon Device in indicated operative vaginal birth.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S M O'BrienDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
C WinterDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
C A BurdenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
M BoulvainDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
T J DraycottDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
J F CroftsDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GBHôpital Beau-Séjour · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate (1) the placement of the BD Odon Device on the model fetal head and (2) perineal distention during simulated operative vaginal births conducted with the BD Odon Device.

designObservational simulation study.

settingNorth Bristol NHS Trust, UK. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Four hundred and forty simulated operative vaginal births.

methodsThree bespoke fetal mannequins were developed to represent (1) bi-parietal diameter of the 50th centile at term, (2) bi-parietal diameter at the 5th centile at term, and (3) 50th centile head with 2 cm of caput. Siting of the BD Odon Device on model heads was determined before and after 400 simulated operative vaginal births. Variables were analysed to determine their effect on device siting and movement during birth. The fetal mannequins were placed inside a maternal mannequin and the BD Odon Device was placed around the fetal head as per the instructions for use. The location of the air cuff was determined before and after the head was delivered. Perineal distension was determined by recording maximum perineal distention during a simulated operative vaginal birth using the same procedure, as well as scenarios employing an inappropriately non-deflated air cuff (for the BD Odon Device), the Kiwi ventouse and non-rotational forceps.

main outcome measuresSite and displacement during birth of the BD Odon Device on a model head. Maximal perineal distension during birth.

resultsThe BD Odon Device was reliably sited in a standard over the fetal head position (approximately 40 mm above the fetal chin) for all stations, head sizes and positions with no significant displacement. In occipito-posterior births, compared with occipito-anterior or transverse, the BD Odon Device routinely sited further down the fetal head (toward the chin). The BD Odon Device was not associated with more perineal distension compared with forceps or Kiwi ventouse (respectively 21, 26 and 21 mm at posterior fourchette).

conclusionsThe BD Odon Device reliably sited over a safe area of the fetal head in 400 simulated births representative of clinical practice. The BD Odon Device generates similar levels of perineal distension compared with Kiwi ventouse when used correctly. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Location of the BD Odon Device on a fetal head in simulation.

Indexed as

Labor PresentationExtraction, ObstetricalFemaleFetusHeadHumansManikinsPerineumPregnancyBD Odon Devicemovementperinealplacementpositioning

Identifiers

PMID28940873
PMCPMC7198112
OpenAlexW2751431711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.