Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940789›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2017

Personalized peptide vaccination as second-line treatment for metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Shigetaka Suekane, Kousuke Ueda, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Tetsuro Sasada, Takuto Yamashita, Noriko Koga, Shigeru Yutani, Shigeki Shichijo, Kyogo Itoh, Tsukasa Igawa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Vaccine approaches to treat urothelial cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shigetaka SuekaneDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-2893
Kousuke UedaDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Kiyoaki NishiharaDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Tetsuro SasadaKanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-8833
Takuto YamashitaBiostatics Center, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Noriko KogaDivision of Clinical Research, Research Center for Innovative Cancer Therapy, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Shigeru YutaniKurume University Cancer Vaccine Center, Kurume, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6306-4130
Shigeki ShichijoKurume University Cancer Vaccine Center, Kurume, Japan.
Kyogo ItohKurume University Cancer Vaccine Center, Kurume, Japan.
Tsukasa IgawaDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Masanori NoguchiDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2328-4985
Kurume University · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the applicability of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (mUTUC) after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. In this single arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial, patients with mUTUC received PPV at a single institution. Personalized peptide vaccination treatment used a maximum of four peptides chosen from 27 candidate peptides according to human leukocyte antigen types and peptide-reactive IgG titers, for six s.c. injections weekly as one cycle. The safety of PPV, as well as its influence on host immunity and effect on overall survival were assessed. Forty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Personalized peptide vaccinations were well tolerated without severe adverse events. Median survival time was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-13.1) with 13.0 months for patients receiving combined salvage chemotherapy (95% CI, 5.7-17.5) and 4.5 months for patients receiving PPV alone (95% CI, 1.7-10.1) (P = 0.080). Patients with positive CTL responses showed a significantly longer survival than patients with negative CTL responses (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.85; P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lower numbers of Bellmunt risk factors and lower levels of B-cell activating factor were significantly associated with favorable overall survival for patients under PPV treatment. This study indicated that PPV for patients with mUTUC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy induced substantial peptide-specific CTL responses without severe adverse events and has the potential to prolong survival when combined with salvage chemotherapy. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID: 000001854.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer VaccinesCarcinoma, Transitional CellDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineProportional Hazards ModelsSalvage TherapyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsVaccines, SubunitCancer VaccinesVaccines, SubunitCancer vaccineimmunotherapypersonalized medicinephase II trialupper tract urothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID28940789
PMCPMC5715265
OpenAlexW2759670648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.