Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940748›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018

Rapid compressed sensing reconstruction of 3D non-Cartesian MRI.

Corey A Baron, Nicholas Dwork, John M Pauly, Dwight G Nishimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A New k-Space Model for Non-Cartesian Fourier Imaging.IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cramér-Rao Bound Optimized Subspace Reconstruction in Quantitative MRI.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Limited-Angle Tomography Using a Neural Network as the Objective Function.International journal of biomedical research & practice · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corey A BaronMagnetic Resonance Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-5580
Nicholas DworkMagnetic Resonance Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
John M PaulyMagnetic Resonance Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Dwight G NishimuraMagnetic Resonance Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015891 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GLOVER, GARY H · 2012 to 2019
$10.7M
Coronary Magnetic Resonance AngiographyR01HL127039 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NISHIMURA, DWIGHT · 2015 to 2023
$3.0M
Predoctoral Training in Biomedical Imaging at Stanford UniversityT32EB009653 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTTS-PAULY, KIM · 2010 to 2019
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127039NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015891NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConventional non-Cartesian compressed sensing requires multiple nonuniform Fourier transforms every iteration, which is computationally expensive. Accordingly, time-consuming reconstructions have slowed the adoption of undersampled 3D non-Cartesian acquisitions into clinical protocols. In this work we investigate several approaches to minimize reconstruction times without sacrificing accuracy.

methodsThe reconstruction problem can be reformatted to exploit the Toeplitz structure of matrices that are evaluated every iteration, but it requires larger oversampling than what is strictly required by nonuniform Fourier transforms. Accordingly, we investigate relative speeds of the two approaches for various nonuniform Fourier transform kernel sizes and oversampling for both GPU and CPU implementations. Second, we introduce a method to minimize matrix sizes by estimating the image support. Finally, density compensation weights have been used as a preconditioning matrix to improve convergence, but this increases noise. We propose a more general approach to preconditioning that allows a trade-off between accuracy and convergence speed.

resultsWhen using a GPU, the Toeplitz approach was faster for all practical parameters. Second, it was found that properly accounting for image support can prevent aliasing errors with minimal impact on reconstruction time. Third, the proposed preconditioning scheme improved convergence rates by an order of magnitude with negligible impact on noise.

conclusionWith the proposed methods, 3D non-Cartesian compressed sensing with clinically relevant reconstruction times (<2 min) is feasible using practical computer resources. Magn Reson Med 79:2685-2692, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Indexed as

BrainData CompressionHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingWavelet Analysiscompressed sensingnon-CartesianNUFFTregularizeSENSEToeplitzwavelet

Identifiers

PMID28940748
PMCPMC6755916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.