Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940306›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2017

Calibration and error analysis of metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters for computed tomography radiation dosimetry.

Sigal Trattner, Peter Prinsen, Jens Wiegert, Elazar-Lars Gerland, Efrat Shefer, Tom Morton, Carla M Thompson, Yoad Yagil, Bin Cheng, Sachin Jambawalikar and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Sigal TrattnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Peter PrinsenPhilips Research, Eindhoven, 5656AE, The Netherlands.
Jens WiegertPhilips Research, Eindhoven, 5656AE, The Netherlands.
Elazar-Lars GerlandPhilips Healthcare, Haifa, 31004, Israel.
Efrat SheferPhilips Healthcare, Haifa, 31004, Israel.
Tom MortonPhilips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, 44143, USA.
Carla M ThompsonDivision of Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Yoad YagilPhilips Healthcare, Haifa, 31004, Israel.
Bin ChengDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sachin JambawalikarDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Rani Al-SenanDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Maxwell AmuraoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sandra S HalliburtonPhilips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, 44143, USA.
Andrew J EinsteinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
New York Hospital Queens · USCleveland State University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USPhilips (Finland) · FIPhilips (Israel) · ILNew York University · USPhilips (Netherlands) · NLPhilips (United States) · US

Funding

PROMISE Trial: Substudy to Assess for Effective Dose of RadiationR01HL109711 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EINSTEIN, ANDREW · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) serve as a helpful tool for organ radiation dosimetry and their use has grown in computed tomography (CT). While different approaches have been used for MOSFET calibration, those using the commonly available 100 mm pencil ionization chamber have not incorporated measurements performed throughout its length, and moreover, no previous work has rigorously evaluated the multiple sources of error involved in MOSFET calibration. In this paper, we propose a new MOSFET calibration approach to translate MOSFET voltage measurements into absorbed dose from CT, based on serial measurements performed throughout the length of a 100-mm ionization chamber, and perform an analysis of the errors of MOSFET voltage measurements and four sources of error in calibration.

methodsMOSFET calibration was performed at two sites, to determine single calibration factors for tube potentials of 80, 100, and 120 kVp, using a 100-mm-long pencil ion chamber and a cylindrical computed tomography dose index (CTDI) phantom of 32 cm diameter. The dose profile along the 100-mm ion chamber axis was sampled in 5 mm intervals by nine MOSFETs in the nine holes of the CTDI phantom. Variance of the absorbed dose was modeled as a sum of the MOSFET voltage measurement variance and the calibration factor variance, the latter being comprised of three main subcomponents: ionization chamber reading variance, MOSFET-to-MOSFET variation and a contribution related to the fact that the average calibration factor of a few MOSFETs was used as an estimate for the average value of all MOSFETs. MOSFET voltage measurement error was estimated based on sets of repeated measurements. The calibration factor overall voltage measurement error was calculated from the above analysis.

resultsCalibration factors determined were close to those reported in the literature and by the manufacturer (~3 mV/mGy), ranging from 2.87 to 3.13 mV/mGy. The error σ

conclusionsA MOSFET calibration method was developed using a 100-mm pencil ion chamber and a CTDI phantom, accompanied by an absorbed dose error analysis reflecting multiple sources of measurement error. When using a single calibration factor, per tube potential, for different MOSFETs, only a small error was introduced into absorbed dose determinations, thus supporting the use of a single calibration factor for experiments involving many MOSFETs, such as those required to accurately estimate radiation effective dose.

Indexed as

Transistors, ElectronicCalibrationMetalsOxidesRadiometryResearch DesignTomography, X-Ray ComputedMetalsOxidescalibrationdosimetryion chambermeasurement errorMOSFET

Identifiers

PMID28940306
PMCPMC5734630
OpenAlexW2759621187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.