Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940131›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Nitrogen nutrition in cotton and control strategies for greenhouse gas emissions: a review.

Aziz Khan, Daniel Kean Yuen Tan, Fazal Munsif, Muhammad Zahir Afridi, Farooq Shah, Fan Wei, Shah Fahad, Ruiyang Zhou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Aziz KhanKey Laboratory of Plant Genetic and Breeding, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Daniel Kean Yuen TanPlant Breeding Institute, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Fazal MunsifDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, 25130, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zahir AfridiDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, 25130, Pakistan.
Farooq ShahDepartment of Agriculture, Garden Campus, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25130, Pakistan.
Fan WeiKey Laboratory of Plant Genetic and Breeding, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Shah FahadCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Ruiyang ZhouKey Laboratory of Plant Genetic and Breeding, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530005, People's Republic of China. ruiyangzhou@aliyun.com.
Guangxi University · CNThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKAbdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKHuazhong Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirustum L.) is grown globally as a major source of natural fiber. Nitrogen (N) management is cumbersome in cotton production systems; it has more impacts on yield, maturity, and lint quality of a cotton crop than other primary plant nutrient. Application and production of N fertilizers consume large amounts of energy, and excess application can cause environmental concerns, i.e., nitrate in ground water, and the production of nitrous oxide a highly potent greenhouse gas (GHG) to the atmosphere, which is a global concern. Therefore, improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of cotton plant is critical in this context. Slow-release fertilizers (e.g., polymer-coated urea) have the potential to increase cotton yield and reduce environmental pollution due to more efficient use of nutrients. Limited literature is available on the mitigation of GHG emissions for cotton production. Therefore, this review focuses on the role of N fertilization, in cotton growth and GHG emission management strategies, and will assess, justify, and organize the researchable priorities. Nitrate and ammonium nitrogen are essential nutrients for successful crop production. Ammonia (NH

Indexed as

AmmoniaFertilizersGossypiumGreenhouse GasesNitratesNitrogenNitrous OxideAmmoniaFertilizersGreenhouse GasesNitratesNitrogenNitrous OxideControl strategiesCottonGreenhouse gas emissionsNitrogenNitrogen translocationNUE

Identifiers

PMID28940131
OpenAlexW2757064165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.