ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2017
Responses of an American eel brain endothelial-like cell line to selenium deprivation and to selenite, selenate, and selenomethionine additions in different exposure media.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic approach towards long-term, serum-free cultivation of fish cells with the RTgill-W1 cell line as example.NAM journal · 2025Article
- Responses of rainbow trout intestinal epithelial cells to different kinds of nutritional deprivation.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2018Article
- A selenium species in cerebrospinal fluid predicts conversion to Alzheimer's dementia in persons with mild cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of selenium deprivation and addition on the American eel brain endothelial cell line (eelB) was studied in three exposure media: complete growth medium (L15/FBS), serum-free medium (L15), and minimal medium (L15/ex). L15/ex contains only galactose and pyruvate and allowed the deprivation of selenium on cells to be studied. In L15/ex, without any obvious source of selenium, eelB cells survived for at least 7 d, formed capillary-like structures (CLS) on Matrigel, and migrated to heal wounds. Three selenium compounds were added to cultures: selenite, selenate, and selenomethionine (SeMet). Adding selenite or selenate to eelB cell cultures for 24 h caused dose-dependent declines in cell viability, regardless of the exposure media. Although varying with exposure media and viability end point, selenite was approximately 70-fold more cytotoxic than selenate. By contrast, 24 h exposures to either DL- or L-SeMet in the three media caused little or no cytotoxicity. However for 7 d exposures in L15/ex, DL- and L-SeMet were very cytotoxic, even at the lowest tested concentration of 31 μM. By contrast in L15 and L15/FBS, cytotoxicity was only observed with 500 and 1000 μM L-SeMet. In L15/FBS, eelB continued to migrate and form CLS in the presence of SeMet but at 500 μM, cell migration appeared stimulated. As judged from a colony-forming assay over 14 d in L15/FBS, 500 and 1000 μM DL- and L-SeMet inhibited cell proliferation. Overall, the responses of eel cells to selenium depended on the selenium form, concentration, and exposure media, with responses to SeMet being most dependent on exposure media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.