Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940083›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2018

Efficacy and safety of antiepileptic drugs for refractory partial-onset epilepsy: a network meta-analysis.

Qingting Hu, Fang Zhang, Wenhui Teng, Fangfang Hao, Jing Zhang, Mingxiao Yin, Naidong Wang

Abstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Astrocytes and Glutamine Synthetase in Epileptogenesis.Journal of neuroscience research · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qingting HuDepartment of Neurology of the Affiliated Hospital of Qing Dao University, 16 Jiangsu Rd, Shinan, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Fang ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology, Qing Dao University School of Pharmacy, Qingdao, China.
Wenhui TengDepartment of Neurology of the Affiliated Hospital of Qing Dao University, 16 Jiangsu Rd, Shinan, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Fangfang HaoDepartment of Neurology of the Affiliated Hospital of Qing Dao University, 16 Jiangsu Rd, Shinan, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology, Qing Dao University School of Pharmacy, Qingdao, China.
Mingxiao YinDepartment of Pharmacology, Qing Dao University School of Pharmacy, Qingdao, China.
Naidong WangDepartment of Neurology of the Affiliated Hospital of Qing Dao University, 16 Jiangsu Rd, Shinan, Qingdao, Shandong, China. wangnaidong163@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-0365

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China No.201611065160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal combination of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for the treatment of refractory partial-onset epilepsy is a perpetual point of debate. While several network meta-analyses (NMAs) have been published, conclusions remain controversial, especially since newer AEDs have been introduced. In our review, we included the newer AEDs to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of AEDs for the treatment of refractory partial-onset epilepsy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library 2017, Issue 1) from their inception to February 18, 2017. The risk of bias in the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated according to the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. An NMA was performed with a Bayesian random-effects model, and we used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve to detect the optimal AEDs. Seventy-six RCTs with 17 AEDs and 20,711 patients were included in the NMAs, which showed that Brivaracetam (BRV), Levetiracetam (LEV), Oxcarbazepine (OXC), Topiramate, Vigabatrin (VGB), and Valproate (VPA) had a greater likelihood of allowing patients to achieve seizure freedom. We also found that LEV was associated with a lower withdrawal rate due to adverse effects than Lacosamide, Eslicarbazepine acetate, OXC, Pregabalin, and Retigabine. LEV, VGB, VPA, and BRV emerged as the agents with the best combination of properties when considering the efficacy and safety outcomes based on the full double-blind treatment period. However, it is critical to perform RCTs and to obtain prospective data from representative cohort studies.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsies, PartialHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticonvulsantsAntiepileptic drugsEpilepsyMeta-analysisPartial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.