Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940054›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Framework for assessment and phytoremediation of asbestos-contaminated sites.

Cédric Gonneau, Kinsey Miller, Sanjay K Mohanty, Rengyi Xu, Wei-Ting Hwang, Jane K Willenbring, Brenda B Casper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cédric GonneauDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. cgonneau@sas.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-1500
Kinsey MillerDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Sanjay K MohantyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Rengyi XuDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Wei-Ting HwangDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jane K WillenbringDepartment of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Brenda B CasperDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USScripps Institution of Oceanography · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Rebecca A Simmons · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Environmental Science Project 3 - Social Determinants of Risk and Attitudes AboutP42ES023720 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BLAIR, IAN ALEXANDER · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences P42 ES023720NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES023720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the feasibility of phytoremediation as an alternative strategy to limit the exposure of asbestos in site with asbestos-containing materials. We collected soils from four locations from two sites-one with naturally occurring asbestos, and another, a superfund site, where asbestos-containing materials were disposed over decades-and performed ecotoxicology tests. We also performed two experiments with crop cultivar and two grasses from serpentine ecotype and cultivar to determined best choice for phytoremediation. Asbestos concentrations in different size fractions of soils varied by orders of magnitude. However, different asbestos concentrations had little effect on germination and root growth. Presence of co-contaminants such as heavy metals and lack of nutrients affected plant growth to different extents, indicating that several of these limiting factors should be considered instead of the primary contaminant of concern. Crop cultivar survived on asbestos-contaminated soil. Grasses from serpentine ecotype did not show higher biomass than the cultivar. Overall, these results showed that soil conditions play a critical role in screening different crop species for phytoremediation and that asbestos concentration has limited to no effect on plant growth. Our study provided a framework for phytoremediation of asbestos-contaminated sites to limit long-term asbestos exposure.

Indexed as

AsbestosBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassEnvironmental MonitoringMetals, HeavyPlant DevelopmentPoaceaeSoilSoil PollutantsUnited StatesAsbestosMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsAsbestosASTM methodCrop cultivarHeavy metalNative grassPhytostabilizationSize fraction

Identifiers

PMID28940054
PMCPMC5769457
OpenAlexW2758472455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.