Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940046›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Validation of the mIBG skeletal SIOPEN scoring method in two independent high-risk neuroblastoma populations: the SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 and COG-A3973 trials.

Ruth Ladenstein, Bieke Lambert, Ulrike Pötschger, Maria-Rita Castellani, Valerie Lewington, Zvi Bar-Sever, Aurore Oudoux, Anna Śliwińska, Katerina Taborska, Lorenzo Biassoni and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Head-to-head comparison of [Pediatric radiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Characteristics and prognostic value of pre-treatmentEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect ofJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. PET in myeloma redefined: a comparative imaging study with FDG and fluorocholine PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Recommendations for the use of nuclear medicine imaging in patients with neuroblastoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  16. Theranostics for Neuroblastoma: Making Molecular Radiotherapy Work Better.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 19 institutions in 11 countries.

Ruth LadensteinChildren's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria. ruth.ladenstein@ccri.at.
Bieke LambertRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ulrike PötschgerChildren's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Maria-Rita CastellaniNuclear Medicine Division, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Valerie LewingtonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Zvi Bar-SeverSchneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Aurore OudouxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine Lille, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France.
Anna ŚliwińskaChildren's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Katerina TaborskaMotol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lorenzo BiassoniGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gregory A YanikUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Arlene NaranjoChildren's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Marguerite T ParisiDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine/ Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Barry L ShulkinDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Helen NadelDepartment of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michael J GelfandDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Katherine K MatthayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Julie R ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine/ Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Susan G KreissmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Dominique Valteau-CouanetPediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.
Ariane BoubakerInstitute of Radiology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research · ATSeattle Children's Hospital · USBritish Columbia Children's Hospital · CACentre Oscar Lambret · FRChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USClinique de La Source · CHDuke Medical Center · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITGhent University Hospital · BEGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRSchneider Children's Medical Center · ILSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity Hospital in Motol · CZUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Cancer Research UK 8177EC Grant QLRI-CT_2002-01768NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValidation of the prognostic value of the SIOPEN mIBG skeletal scoring system in two independent stage 4, mIBG avid, high-risk neuroblastoma populations.

resultsThe semi-quantitative SIOPEN score evaluates skeletal meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) uptake on a 0-6 scale in 12 anatomical regions. Evaluable mIBG scans from 216 COG-A3973 and 341 SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 trial patients were reviewed pre- and post-induction chemotherapy. The prognostic value of skeletal scores for 5-year event free survival (5 yr.-EFS) was tested in the source and validation cohorts. At diagnosis, both cohorts showed a gradual non-linear increase in risk with cumulative scores. Several approaches were explored to test the relationship between score and EFS. Ultimately, a cutoff score of ≤3 was the most useful predictor across trials. A SIOPEN score ≤ 3 pre-induction was found in 15% SIOPEN patients and in 22% of COG patients and increased post-induction to 60% in SIOPEN patients and to 73% in COG patients. Baseline 5 yr.-EFS rates in the SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 cohort for scores ≤3 were 47% ± 7% versus 26% ± 3% for higher scores at diagnosis (p < 0.007) and 36% ± 4% versus 14% ± 4% (p < 0.001) for scores obtained post-induction. The COG-A3973 showed 5 yr.-EFS rates for scores ≤3 of 51% ± 7% versus 34% ± 4% for higher scores (p < 0.001) at diagnosis and 43% ± 5% versus 16% ± 6% (p = 0.004) for post-induction scores. Hazard ratios (HR) significantly favoured patients with scores ≤3 after adjustment for age and MYCN-amplification. Optimal outcomes were recorded in patients who achieved complete skeletal response.

conclusionsValidation in two independent cohorts confirms the prognostic value of the SIOPEN skeletal score. In particular, patients with an absolute SIOPEN score > 3 after induction have very poor outcomes and should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Societies, Medical3-IodobenzylguanidineAdolescentBiological TransportChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeuroblastomaPrognosisRisk3-IodobenzylguanidineHigh-risk neuroblastomaMIBGSIOPEN score

Identifiers

PMID28940046
PMCPMC5747549
OpenAlexW2758777848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.