Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28940040›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2018

Analysis of mortality in a pooled cohort of Canadian and German uranium processing workers with no mining experience.

Lydia B Zablotska, Nora Fenske, Maria Schnelzer, Sergey Zhivin, Dominique Laurier, Michaela Kreuzer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. US drinking water quality: exposure risk profiles for seven legacy and emerging contaminants.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radiation databases and archives - examples and comparisons.International journal of radiation biology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lydia B ZablotskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Lydia.Zablotska@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0778-1108
Nora FenskeDepartment of Radiation Protection and Health, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
Maria SchnelzerDepartment of Radiation Protection and Health, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
Sergey ZhivinFrench National Institute of Health and Medical Research, INSERM, Paris, France.
Dominique LaurierInstitute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, IRSN, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France.
Michaela KreuzerDepartment of Radiation Protection and Health, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
Federal Office for Radiation Protection · DEInserm · FRInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FRUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 87055-13-0577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLong-term health risks of occupational exposures to uranium processing were examined to better understand potential differences with uranium underground miners and nuclear reactor workers.

methodsA cohort study of mortality of workers from Port Hope, Canada (1950-1999) and Wismut, Germany (1946-2008) employed in uranium milling, refining, and processing was conducted. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between cumulative exposures to radon decay products (RDP) and gamma-rays and causes of death potentially related to uranium processing.

resultsThe pooled cohort included 7431 workers (270,201 person-years of follow-up). Mean RDP exposures were lower than in miners while gamma-ray doses were higher than in reactor workers. Both exposures were highly correlated (weighted rho = 0.81). Radiation risks of lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in males were increased but not statistically significant and compatible with risks estimated for miners and reactor workers, respectively. Higher RDP-associated CVD risks were observed for exposures 5-14 years prior to diagnosis compared to later exposures and among those employed <5 years. Radiation risks of solid cancers excluding lung cancer were increased, but not statistically significant, both for males and females, while all other causes of death were not associated with exposures.

conclusionsIn the largest study of uranium processing workers to systematically examine radiation risks of multiple outcomes from RDP exposures and gamma-rays, estimated radiation risks were compatible with risks reported for uranium miners and nuclear reactor workers. Continued follow-up and pooling with other cohorts of uranium processing workers are necessary for future comparisons with other workers of the nuclear fuel cycle.

Indexed as

MetallurgyAdolescentAdultAgedCanadaCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleGamma RaysGermanyHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesRadon DaughtersUraniumCohort studyGamma radiationRadonRisk assessmentUranium

Identifiers

PMID28940040
PMCPMC5752750
OpenAlexW3163730170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.