Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939980›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2018

Targeted exome sequencing in anti-factor H antibody negative HUS reveals multiple variations.

R W Thergaonkar, Ankita Narang, Bahadur Singh Gurjar, Pradeep Tiwari, Mamta Puraswani, Himanshi Saini, Aditi Sinha, Binuja Varma, Mitali Mukerji, Pankaj Hari and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anti-factor B antibodies in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Thrombotic microangiopathy in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complement in Secondary Thrombotic Microangiopathy.Kidney international reports · 2021
    Review
  7. Genetic Testing in Pediatric Kidney Disease.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R W ThergaonkarDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Ankita NarangCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Bahadur Singh GurjarNational Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.
Pradeep TiwariCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Mamta PuraswaniDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Himanshi SainiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Aditi SinhaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Binuja VarmaCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Mitali MukerjiCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Pankaj HariDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Arvind BaggaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. arvindbagga@hotmail.com.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INNational Institute of Immunology · IN

Funding

CEFIPRA 4703-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic susceptibility to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) may lie within genes regulating or activating the alternate complement and related pathways converging on endothelial cell activation.

methodsWe tested 32 Indian patients of aHUS negative for antibodies to complement factor H for genetic variations in a panel of 15 genes, i.e., CFH, CFHR1-5, CFI, CFB, C3, CD46, MASP2, DGKE, ADAMTS13, THBD and PLG using next-generation DNA sequencing and for copy number variation in CFHR1-3.

resultsDespite absence of a public database of exome variations in the Indian population and limited functional studies, we could establish a genetic diagnosis in 6 (18.8%) patients using a stringent scheme of prioritization. One patient carried a likely pathogenic variation. The number of patients carrying possibly pathogenic variation was as follows: 1 variation: 5 patients, 2 variations: 9 patients, 3 variations: 5 patients, 4 variations: 9 patients, 5 variations: 2 patients and 6 variations: 2 patients. Homozygous deletion of CFHR1-3 was present in five patients; none of these carried a diagnostic genetic variation. Patients with or without diagnostic variation did not differ significantly in terms of enrichment of genetic variations that were rare/novel or predicted deleterious, or for possible environmental triggers.

conclusionWe conclude that genetic testing for multiple genes in patients with aHUS negative for anti-FH antibodies reveals multiple candidate variations that require prioritization. Population data on variation frequency of the Indian population and supportive functional studies are likely to improve diagnostic yield.

Indexed as

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic SyndromeCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolDNA Mutational AnalysisExomeFemaleHumansInfantMaleHemolytic uremic syndromeMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationNext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28939980
OpenAlexW2758138742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.