Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939952›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2018

2D and 3D texture analysis to differentiate brain metastases on MR images: proceed with caution.

Monika Béresová, Andrés Larroza, Estanislao Arana, József Varga, László Balkay, David Moratal

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. MR-based radiomics predictive modelling of EGFR mutation and HER2 overexpression in metastatic brain adenocarcinoma: a two-centre study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika BéresováDivision of Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary. beres.monika@med.unideb.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-3788
Andrés LarrozaDepartment of Medicine, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Estanislao AranaDepartment of Radiology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
József VargaDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
László BalkayDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
David MoratalCenter for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
University of Debrecen · HUFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESUniversitat de València · ESUniversitat Politècnica de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo find structural differences between brain metastases of lung and breast cancer, computing their heterogeneity parameters by means of both 2D and 3D texture analysis (TA). MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with 58 brain metastases from breast (26) and lung cancer (32) were examined by MR imaging. Brain lesions were manually delineated by 2D ROIs on the slices of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1) images, and local binary patterns (LBP) maps were created from each region. Histogram-based (minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, and variance), and co-occurrence matrix-based (contrast, correlation, energy, entropy, and homogeneity) 2D, weighted average of the 2D slices, and true 3D TA were obtained on the CET1 images and LBP maps.

resultsFor LBP maps and 2D TA contrast, correlation, energy, and homogeneity were identified as statistically different heterogeneity parameters (SDHPs) between lung and breast metastasis. The weighted 3D TA identified entropy as an additional SDHP. Only two texture indexes (TI) were significantly different with true 3D TA: entropy and energy. All these TIs discriminated between the two tumor types significantly by ROC analysis. For the CET1 images there was no SDHP at all by 3D TA.

conclusionOur results indicate that the used textural analysis methods may help with discriminating between brain metastases of different primary tumors.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm MetastasisBrainBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsModels, StatisticalRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaBrain neoplasmsBreast cancerComputer-assistedImage processingLung cancerMagnetic resonance imagingMetastasisTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID28939952
OpenAlexW2758789660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.