Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939919›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Validity of wavelet transforms for analysis of video head impulse test (vHIT) results.

Jorge Rey-Martinez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jorge Rey-MartinezOtolaryngology Unit, ORLGipuzkoa, Hospital de día Quironsalud Donostia, Alkolea Parkea 7, 20012, San Sebastián, Spain. bendermh@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-3823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the applicability of discrete wavelet transforms in the analysis of vHIT responses. Discrete wavelet transform was applied to vHIT responses and a new method for calculating aVOR gain was developed. A prospective study was performed with two groups of normal (N = 10) and altered (N = 19) gain values; HIMP and SHIMP vHIT protocols were performed on both groups. To evaluate the gain values obtained, Intraclass Correlation Index, Pearson's correlation, linear regression, and t test were performed. Intraclass correlation indexes of 0.97 and 0.99 were determined for HIMP and SHIMP procedures performed on the proposed and standard gain calculation method. A significant difference of - 0.06 ± 0.07 (p < 0.001) was found between gain calculation methods for HIMP protocol. Significant differences were found (p < 0.001) between normal and altered groups for all gain calculation methods. Discrete wavelet transforms were successfully applied to measure head impulse test responses. Gain values obtained with this method appear to be valid and in concordance with gain values obtained with standard calculation method. However, a slight but significant difference was observed when this method was applied to tests obtained with HIMP.

Indexed as

Wavelet AnalysisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHead Impulse TestHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReflex, Vestibulo-OcularReproducibility of ResultsSaccadesAlgorithmDesaccadeDiscrete wavelet transformsGainHIMPSaccadeSHIMPvHITVOR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.