Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939908›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Microbiome profile of the amniotic fluid as a predictive biomarker of perinatal outcome.

Daichi Urushiyama, Wataru Suda, Eriko Ohnishi, Ryota Araki, Chihiro Kiyoshima, Masamitsu Kurakazu, Ayako Sanui, Fusanori Yotsumoto, Masaharu Murata, Kazuki Nabeshima and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Shaping Microbiota During the First 1000 Days of Life.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of goblet cells and mucus in intestinal homeostasis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Daichi UrushiyamaDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan.
Wataru SudaDepartment of Computational Biology, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, 277-8561, Japan.
Eriko OhnishiDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan.
Ryota ArakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Chihiro KiyoshimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Masamitsu KurakazuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Ayako SanuiCenter for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Fusanori YotsumotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Masaharu MurataCenter for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Kazuki NabeshimaDepartment of Pathology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine and Hospital, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Shin'ichiro YasunagaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Shigeru SaitoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toyama, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Makoto NomiyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Saga Hospital, Saga, 849-8577, Japan.
Masahira HattoriDepartment of Computational Biology, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, 277-8561, Japan.
Shingo MiyamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Kenichiro HataDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan. hata-k@ncchd.go.jp.
Fukuoka University · JPFukuoka University Hospital · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPKeio University · JPNational Sagamihara Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chorioamnionitis (CAM), an inflammation of the foetal membranes due to infection, is associated with preterm birth and poor perinatal prognosis. The present study aimed to determine whether CAM can be diagnosed prior to delivery based on the bacterial composition of the amniotic fluid (AF). AF samples from 79 patients were classified according to placental inflammation: Stage III (n = 32), CAM; Stage II (n = 27), chorionitis; Stage 0-I (n = 20), sub-chorionitis or no neutrophil infiltration; and normal AF in early pregnancy (n = 18). Absolute quantification and sequencing of 16S rDNA showed that in Stage III, the 16S rDNA copy number was significantly higher and the α-diversity index lower than those in the other groups. In principal coordinate analysis, Stage III formed a separate cluster from Stage 0-I, normal AF, and blank. Forty samples were classified as positive for microbiomic CAM (miCAM) defined by the presence of 11 bacterial species that were found to be significantly associated with CAM and some parameters of perinatal prognosis. The diagnostic accuracy for CAM according to miCAM was: sensitivity, approximately 94%, and specificity, 79-87%. Our findings indicate the possibility of predicting CAM prior to delivery based on the AF microbiome profile.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAdultAmniotic FluidBacteriaBiomarkersChorioamnionitisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrognosisBiomarkersDNA, BacterialDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID28939908
PMCPMC5610236
OpenAlexW2754442650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.