Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Novel pathogenic mutations in C1QTNF5 support a dominant negative disease mechanism in late-onset retinal degeneration.

Chloe M Stanton, Shyamanga Borooah, Camilla Drake, Joseph A Marsh, Susan Campbell, Alan Lennon, Dinesh C Soares, Neeru A Vallabh, Jayashree Sahni, Artur V Cideciyan and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Late-Onset Retinal Degeneration: Clinical Features and C1QTNF5/CTRP5 Function.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Late-Onset Retinal Degeneration: Clinical Perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chloe M StantonMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. chloe.stanton@igmm.ed.ac.uk.
Shyamanga BorooahMedical Research Council Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Camilla DrakeMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Joseph A MarshMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-0628
Susan CampbellMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alan LennonMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Dinesh C SoaresMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7557-0495
Neeru A VallabhSt. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jayashree SahniDepartment of Eye and Vision Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Artur V CideciyanScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Baljean DhillonPrincess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5993-0278
Veronique VitartMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Samuel G JacobsonScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alan F WrightMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Caroline HaywardMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9405-9550
Institute of Genetics and Cancer · GBPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USPrincess Alexandra Eye Pavilion · GBRoche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127561128Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127584475Medical Research Council MC_U127584475Medical Research Council MR/M02122X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) is a rare autosomal dominant retinal dystrophy, characterised by extensive sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) deposits, RPE atrophy, choroidal neovascularisation and photoreceptor cell death associated with severe visual loss. L-ORD shows striking phenotypic similarities to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a common and genetically complex disorder, which can lead to misdiagnosis in the early stages. To date, a single missense mutation (S163R) in the C1QTNF5 gene, encoding C1q And Tumor Necrosis Factor Related Protein 5 (C1QTNF5) has been shown to cause L-ORD in a subset of affected families. Here, we describe the identification and characterisation of three novel pathogenic mutations in C1QTNF5 in order to elucidate disease mechanisms. In silico and in vitro characterisation show that these mutations perturb protein folding, assembly or polarity of secretion of C1QTNF5 and, importantly, all appear to destabilise the wildtype protein in co-transfection experiments in a human RPE cell line. This suggests that the heterozygous mutations in L-ORD show a dominant negative, rather than a haploinsufficient, disease mechanism. The function of C1QTNF5 remains unclear but this new insight into the pathogenetic basis of L-ORD has implications for future therapeutic strategies such as gene augmentation therapy.

Indexed as

MutationAgedAmino Acid SequenceCell LineCollagenFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, MolecularMutation, MissensePedigreeProtein DomainsProtein FoldingRetinal DegenerationSequence AlignmentC1QTNF5 protein, humanCollagen

Identifiers

PMID28939808
PMCPMC5610255
OpenAlexW2755531344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.