Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939577›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

Usage of purchased self-tests for HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: results of population-based and serial cross-sectional studies among the general population and sexual risk groups.

Janneke P Bil, Maria Prins, Ineke G Stolte, Henriëtte Dijkshoorn, Titia Heijman, Marieke B Snijder, Udi Davidovich, Freke R Zuure

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Syphilis Self-testing: A Nationwide Pragmatic Study Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janneke P BilDepartment of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria PrinsDepartment of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ineke G StolteDepartment of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henriëtte DijkshoornDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Titia HeijmanSexually Transmitted Infections Outpatient Clinic, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke B SnijderDepartment of Public Health/Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Udi DavidovichDepartment of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Freke R ZuureDepartment of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GGD Amsterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere are limited data on the usage of commercially bought self-tests for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Therefore, we studied HIV/STI self-test usage and its determinants among the general population and sexual risk groups between 2007 and 2015 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

settingData were collected in four different studies among the general population (S1

participantsS1 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of HIV/STI self-test usage and its determinants.

resultsThe prevalence of HIV/STI self-test usage in the preceding 6-12 months varied between 1% and 2% across studies. Chlamydia self-tests were most commonly used, except among MSM in S3. Chlamydia and syphilis self-test usage increased over time among the representative sample of Amsterdam residents (S1) and chlamydia self-test usage increased over time among STI clinic clients (S4). Self-test usage was associated with African Surinamese or Ghanaian ethnic origin (S2), being woman or MSM (S1 and 4) and having had a higher number of sexual partners (S1-2). Among those in the general population who tested for HIV/STI in the preceding 12 months, 5-9% used a self-test.

conclusionsDespite low HIV/STI self-test usage, we observed increases over time in chlamydia and syphilis self-test usage. Furthermore, self-test usage was higher among high-risk individuals in the general population. It is important to continue monitoring self-test usage and informing the public about the unknown quality of available self-tests in the Netherlands and about the pros and cons of self-testing.

Indexed as

Self CareAdultChlamydia InfectionsCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNetherlandsReagent Kits, DiagnosticRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorReagent Kits, DiagnosticChlamydiaPublic HealthSelf-testingSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID28939577
PMCPMC5623511
OpenAlexW2756624638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.