ArticleBMJ open2017
Protocol for a realist review of complex interventions to prevent adolescents from engaging in multiple risk behaviours.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A realist inquiry to examine the implementation of Advanced Nurse Practitioner roles in General Practice settings: A realist review protocol.HRB open research · 2026Article
- Understanding the contextual and causal factors shaping the work of receptionists in general practice: a realist review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- How can funding for nature-based programmes impact health inequalities? A realist protocol.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Understanding trauma-impaired executive function and its impacts on homeless adults in the UK: a realist evaluative synthesis protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Theoretical foundations and mechanisms of health systems responsiveness: a realist synthesis.SSM - health systems · 2025Review
- Reducing LGBTQ+ adolescent mental health inequalities: a realist review of school-based interventions.Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England) · 2024Review
- Tackling unmanaged oropharyngeal dysphagia in primary care: a behavioural science realist review of interventions.BMJ open · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- A realist review protocol on communications for community engagement in maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Protocol for a realist synthesis of health systems responsiveness in low-income and middle-income countries.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2021Article
- Article
- Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders: protocol for a realist systematic review.International journal of mental health systems · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAdolescent risk behaviours are a key health concern. The purpose of this research is to gaina deeper understanding of how, why, for whom, and inwhat circumstances complex adolescent risk behaviourprevention programmes are most successful. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To understand how adolescent risk behaviour prevention programmes work in a reallife context, a realist synthesis will be undertaken, operationalised in four phases. DATA ANALYSIS: A realist logic of analysis will be used to align data from each phase with context mechanism outcome configurations or specific elements thereof. Substantive theory will then be sought to understand and explain the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethics committee at Northumbria University, UK. Findings will be disseminated through knowledge exchange with stakeholders, publications in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, and formal and informal reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.