Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939474›Full record

ArticleBrain research bulletin2018

Heroin-induced suppression of saccharin intake in OPRM1 A118G mice.

Christopher S Freet, Danielle N Alexander, Caesar G Imperio, Victor Ruiz-Velasco, Patricia S Grigson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. GABAFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Review
  4. Translational Research in Nicotine Addiction.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher S FreetDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States. Electronic address: csf5@psu.edu.
Danielle N AlexanderDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Caesar G ImperioDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Victor Ruiz-VelascoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Patricia S GrigsonDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.

Funding

Drugs of Abuse and Learned Aversions: Solving a ParadoxR37DA009815 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 2012 to 2020
$2.9M
DRUGS OF ABUSE AND LEARNED AVERSIONS: SOLVING A PARADOXR01DA009815 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 1996 to 2011
$2.3M
Coupling mechanisms of NOP receptors and calcium channelsR01DA025574 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI RUIZ-VELASCO, VICTOR · 2009 to 2012
$1.1M
DeltaFosB and Reward Comparison in MiceF31DA024519 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI FREET, CHRISTOPHER S · 2008 to 2009
$47k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA024519NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009815NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025574NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA009815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The single nucleotide polymorphism of the μ-opioid receptor, OPRM1 A118G, has been associated with greater drug and alcohol use, increased sensitivity to pain, and reduced sensitivity to the antinociceptive effects of opiates. In the present studies, we employed a 'humanized' mouse model containing the wild-type (118AA) or variant (118GG) allele to examine behavior in a model of heroin-induced devaluation of an otherwise palatable saccharin cue when repeated saccharin-heroin pairings occurred every 24h (Experiment 1) or every 48h (Experiment 2). The results showed that, while both the 118AA and 118GG mice demonstrated robust avoidance of the heroin-paired saccharin cue following daily taste-drug pairings, only the 118AA mice suppressed intake of the heroin-paired saccharin cue when 48h elapsed between each taste-drug pairing. Humanized 118GG mice, then, defend their intake of the sweet cue despite saccharin-heroin pairings and this effect is illuminated by the use of spaced, rather than massed, trials. Given that this pattern of strain difference is not evident with saccharin-cocaine pairings (Freet et al., 2015), reduced avoidance of the heroin-paired saccharin cue by the 118GG mice may be due to an interaction between the opiate and the subjects' drive for the sweet or, alternatively, to differential downstream sensitivity to the aversive kappa mediated properties of the drug. These alternative hypotheses are addressed.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAssociation LearningAvoidance LearningBody WeightChoice BehaviorCircadian RhythmCuesDrinkingHeroinHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicAnalgesics, OpioidHeroinOPRM1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, muSaccharinSweetening AgentsAddictionNatural rewardsOpiatesReward comparison

Identifiers

PMID28939474
PMCPMC5860935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.