Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28939223›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2017

Stereotactic Radiosurgery With or Without Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Limited Brain Metastases: A Secondary Analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0574 (Alliance) Randomized Controlled Trial.

Thomas M Churilla, Karla V Ballman, Paul D Brown, Erin L Twohy, Kurt Jaeckle, Elana Farace, Jane H Cerhan, S Keith Anderson, Xiomara W Carrero, Yolanda I Garces and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Thomas M ChurillaRadiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Karla V BallmanAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Paul D BrownMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Brown.Paul@mayo.edu.
Erin L TwohyAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kurt JaeckleMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Elana FaracePenn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Jane H CerhanMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
S Keith AndersonAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Xiomara W CarreroAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yolanda I GarcesMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Fred G BarkerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard DemingMercy Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa.
Jesse G DixonAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Stuart H BurriLevine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Caroline ChungUniversity of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cynthia MénardCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Volker W StieberNovant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Bruce E PollockMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Evanthia GalanisMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jan C BucknerMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Anthony L AsherLevine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina; Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
RTOG Foreign AccrualU10CA021661 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI CURRAN, WALTER J. · 1985 to 2013
$150.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ONCOLOGY TRIALS GROUPU10CA076001 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1998 to 2013
$62.1M
Naional Cancer Institute, Naitonal Clinical Trials Network U10 Lead Academic SiteU10CA180790 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALBERTS, STEVEN R, BOUGHEY, JUDY CAROLINE · 2014 to 2018
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021661NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NCI NIH HHS U10 CA076001NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180790NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is associated with improved overall survival among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with favorable prognoses at diagnosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the N0574 trial, patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases were randomized to receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or SRS plus WBRT (SRS + WBRT), with a primary endpoint of cognitive deterioration. We calculated diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) scores for NSCLC patients and evaluated overall survival according to receipt of WBRT and DS-GPA score using 2 separate cut-points (≥2.0 vs <2.0 and ≥2.5 vs <2.5).

resultsA total of 126 NSCLC patients were included for analysis, with median follow-up of 14.2 months. Data for DS-GPA calculation were available for 86.3% of all enrolled NSCLC patients. Overall, 50.0% of patients had DS-GPA score ≥2.0, and 23.0% of patients had DS-GPA scores ≥2.5. The SRS and SRS + WBRT groups were well balanced with regard to prognostic factors. The median survival according to receipt of WBRT was 11.3 months (+WBRT) and 17.9 months (-WBRT) for patients with DS-GPA ≥2.0 (favorable prognoses, P=.63; hazard ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.59). Median survival was 3.7 months (+WBRT) and 6.6 months (-WBRT) for patients with DS-GPA <2.0 patients (unfavorable prognoses, P=.85; hazard ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.62). Outcomes according to the receipt of WBRT and DS-GPA remained similar utilizing DS-GPA ≥2.5 as a cutoff for favorable prognoses. There was no interaction between the continuum of the DS-GPA groups and WBRT on overall survival (P=.53).

conclusionsWe observed no significant differences in survival according to receipt of WBRT in favorable-prognosis NSCLC patients. This study further supports the approach of SRS alone in the majority of patients with limited brain metastases.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCombined Modality TherapyCranial IrradiationHumansPrognosisRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID28939223
PMCPMC5699951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.