Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28938859›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants & redox signaling2018

Redox Sensing by Fe

Azul Pinochet-Barros, John D Helmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants & redox signaling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Microbial metal physiology: ions to ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Linking Virulence and Iron Limitation Response inJournal of proteome research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Azul Pinochet-BarrosDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York.
John D HelmannDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Bacillus subtilis Stress ResponsesR35GM122461 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI John D Helmann · 2017 to 2026
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceIron is required for growth and is often redox active under cytosolic conditions. As a result of its facile redox chemistry, iron homeostasis is intricately involved with oxidative stress. Bacterial adaptation to iron limitation and oxidative stress often involves ferric uptake regulator (Fur) proteins: a diverse set of divalent cation-dependent, DNA-binding proteins that vary widely in both metal selectivity and sensitivity to metal-catalyzed oxidation. Recent Advances: Bacteria contain two Fur family metalloregulators that use ferrous iron (Fe CRITICAL ISSUES: To effectively regulate iron homeostasis, Fur has an Fe FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The features that determine the disparate reactivity of these proteins with oxidants are still poorly understood. A controlled, comparative analysis of the affinities of Fur/PerR proteins for their metal cofactors and their rate of reactivity with H

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsFerrous CompoundsOxidation-ReductionRepressor ProteinsBacterial Proteinsferric uptake regulating proteins, bacterialFerrous CompoundsRepressor ProteinsBacillus subtilishydrogen peroxideironmetalloregulationoxidative stressStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID28938859
PMCPMC6217742
OpenAlexW2758445403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.