Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28938785›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2017

Growth performance and gastrointestinal responses of broiler chickens fed corn-soybean meal diet without or with exogenous epidermal growth factor upon challenge with Eimeria.

E Kim, H Leung, N Akhtar, J Li, J R Barta, Y Wang, C Yang, E Kiarie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of the In Ovo Injection of Vitamin DAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exogenous Enzymes InfluencedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Expression ofBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E KimDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1.
H LeungDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1.
N AkhtarDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1.
J LiDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1.
J R BartaDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1.
Y WangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2.
C YangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2.
E KiarieDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1.
University of Guelph · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor (EGF), a protein known for its mitogenic and anti-apoptotic effects was fed to broiler chickens to evaluate growth performance, gastrointestinal measurements, and apparent retention (AR) of components upon challenge with Eimeria. A total of 216, d old male broiler chicks (Ross 708) were placed in cages (6 birds/cage) and allocated to treatments. The treatments were: 1) control (Lactotobacilli lactis fermentation supernatant without EGF), 2) 80 μg of EGF/kg BW/d, and 3) 160 μg of EGF/kg BW/d. A basal antibiotic-free corn-soybean diet containing TiO2 was used. Birds were offered fresh feed with respective treatments on daily basis and had free access to drinking water for 14 d. On d 5, birds (6 replicates per treatment) were challenged with 1 mL of E. acervulina and E. maxima mixture via oral gavage and the other 6 replicates were given sham. Growth performance was measured in pre- (d 0 to 5) and post- (d 6 to 14) challenge periods. Two birds per cage were necropsied on d 10 for intestinal lesion scores and tissue samples for histomorphology and expression of select intestinal genes. Excreta samples for AR of components and oocyst shedding were taken d 10 to 13 and all birds were necropsied on d 14 for gastrointestinal weight. The EGF linearly (P < 0.05) increased BWG before challenge. There was no EGF and Eimeria interaction (P > 0.05) on growth performance, AR of GE, and intestinal histomorphology; the main effects were such that Eimeria depressed (P < 0.01) BWG, FCR, AR of DM, crude fat, and GE, and villi height to crypt depth ratio. An interaction between EGF and Eimeria (P < 0.05) on indices of gut function was such that EGF improved expression of genes for nutrient transporters and tight junction proteins in Eimeria challenged birds whilst no effect in non-challenged control. In conclusion, Eimeria challenge reduced growth performance and impaired gut function; EGF showed beneficial effects on growth pre-challenge and improved indices of gut function upon Eimeria challenge.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsChickensCoccidiosisDietDietary SupplementsEimeriaEpidermal Growth FactorGastrointestinal TractGlycine maxMalePoultry DiseasesRandom AllocationZea maysEpidermal Growth FactorbroilercoccidiosisEimeriaepidermal growth factorgut health and function

Identifiers

PMID28938785
PMCPMC5850350
OpenAlexW2741728655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.