Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28938721›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2017

The draft genome sequence of a desert tree Populus pruinosa.

Wenlu Yang, Kun Wang, Jian Zhang, Jianchao Ma, Jianquan Liu, Tao Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. eYGFPuv-Assisted Transgenic Selection inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome skimming-based simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker discovery and characterization inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenlu YangMOE Key Laboratory for Bio-resources and Eco-environment, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Yihuan Road, 610065 Chengdu, China.
Kun WangMOE Key Laboratory for Bio-resources and Eco-environment, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Yihuan Road, 610065 Chengdu, China.
Jian ZhangState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, College of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jianchao MaState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, College of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jianquan LiuMOE Key Laboratory for Bio-resources and Eco-environment, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Yihuan Road, 610065 Chengdu, China.
Tao MaMOE Key Laboratory for Bio-resources and Eco-environment, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Yihuan Road, 610065 Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populus pruinosa is a large tree that grows in deserts and shows distinct differences in both morphology and adaptation compared to its sister species, P. euphratica. Here we present a draft genome sequence for P. pruinosa and examine genomic variations between the 2 species. A total of 60 Gb of clean reads from whole-genome sequencing of a P. pruinosa individual were generated using the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. The assembled genome is 479.3 Mb in length, with an N50 contig size of 14.0 kb and a scaffold size of 698.5 kb; 45.47% of the genome is composed of repetitive elements. We predicted 35 131 protein-coding genes, of which 88.06% were functionally annotated. Gene family clustering revealed 224 unique and 640 expanded gene families in the P. pruinosa genome. Further evolutionary analysis identified numerous genes with elevated values for pairwise genetic differentiation between P. pruinosa and P. euphratica. We provide the genome sequence and gene annotation for P. pruinosa. A large number of genetic variations were recovered by comparison of the genomes between P. pruinosa and P. euphratica. These variations will provide a valuable resource for studying the genetic bases for the phenotypic and adaptive divergence of the 2 sister species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesPolymorphism, GeneticPopulusWhole Genome Sequencingannotationgenome assemblyIllumina sequencingPopulus pruinosa

Identifiers

PMID28938721
PMCPMC5603765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.