Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28937997›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato - An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories.

Malin Lager, Maximilian Faller, Peter Wilhelmsson, Vivian Kjelland, Åshild Andreassen, Rimtas Dargis, Hanne Quarsten, Ram Dessau, Volker Fingerle, Gabriele Margos and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distribution ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Microorganisms inInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Analytical comparison of 11 CE-IVD marked real-time PCR assays for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato detection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Borrelia surface proteins: new horizons in Lyme disease diagnosis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Developing a Prospective Gestational Lyme Disease Study.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecular Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Quantitative multiplexed strategies for human Lyme disease serological testing.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Lyme neuroborreliosis in Swedish children-PCR as a complementary diagnostic method for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in cerebrospinal fluid.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Malin LagerLaboratory Medicine, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9904-6898
Maximilian FallerGerman National Reference Centre for Borrelia, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Peter WilhelmssonDivision of Medical Microbiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Vivian KjellandFaculty of Engineering and Science, Department of Natural Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Åshild AndreassenDivision of Infectious Disease Control, Department of Virology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Rimtas DargisDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Hanne QuarstenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Ram DessauDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Volker FingerleGerman National Reference Centre for Borrelia, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Gabriele MargosGerman National Reference Centre for Borrelia, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Sølvi NoraasDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Katharina OrnsteinDivision of Medicine, Skånevård Kryh, Region Skåne, Sweden.
Ann-Cathrine PeterssonDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Lund, Sweden.
Andreas MatussekClinical Microbiology, Laboratory Medicine, Region Jönköping County, Sweden.
Per-Eric LindgrenDivision of Medical Microbiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna J HenningssonClinical Microbiology, Laboratory Medicine, Region Jönköping County, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick transmitted disease in Europe. The diagnosis of LB today is based on the patient´s medical history, clinical presentation and laboratory findings. The laboratory diagnostics are mainly based on antibody detection, but in certain conditions molecular detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may serve as a complement.

aimThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity and concordance of eight different real-time PCR methods at five laboratories in Sweden, Norway and Denmark.

methodEach participating laboratory was asked to analyse three different sets of samples (reference panels; all blinded) i) cDNA extracted and transcribed from water spiked with cultured Borrelia strains, ii) cerebrospinal fluid spiked with cultured Borrelia strains, and iii) DNA dilution series extracted from cultured Borrelia and relapsing fever strains. The results and the method descriptions of each laboratory were systematically evaluated. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe analytical sensitivities and the concordance between the eight protocols were in general high. The concordance was especially high between the protocols using 16S rRNA as the target gene, however, this concordance was mainly related to cDNA as the type of template. When comparing cDNA and DNA as the type of template the analytical sensitivity was in general higher for the protocols using DNA as template regardless of the use of target gene. The analytical specificity for all eight protocols was high. However, some protocols were not able to detect Borrelia spielmanii, Borrelia lusitaniae or Borrelia japonica.

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiCerebrospinal FluidDenmarkLyme DiseaseNorwayReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRelapsing FeverRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySwedenWater MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID28937997
PMCPMC5609768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.