ArticleASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
Development and Feasibility of Self-Management Application in Left-Ventricular Assist Devices.
Article in ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pilot clinical trial of a self-management intervention in patients with a left ventricular assist device.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2022Trial
- Home care challenges and adaptive capacity in patients with left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-informed qualitative study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Novel Targets for a Combination of Mechanical Unloading with Pharmacotherapy in Advanced Heart Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- VAD Patients' Perception of Potential Telemedicine Support.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Self-management for patients on ventricular assist device support: a national, multicentre study: protocol for a 3-phase study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Developing a mobile health app for chronic illness management: Insights from focus groups.Digital healthArticle
- Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of Ventricular Assist Device Self-care Education Inform the Development of a Simulation-based Mastery Learning Curriculum.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite major advancements in mechanical circulatory support, the self-management (SM) for patients with a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains complex and challenging for patients and their caregivers. We have developed a mobile phone application (VAD Care App) to organize and simplify the LVAD SM process. This article describes the development and feasibility study of the app as an SM tool for LVAD patients and caregivers requiring support from ventricular assist device (VAD) coordinators. The specific aim was to evaluate the app's acceptability and usability and the users' competency. App features included an automated alert, data collection/reporting, and dynamic real-time interaction systems embedded in the LVAD SM process. Beta-testing of the prototype was completed by five adults. For the feasibility study, we employed a mixed-method descriptive research design involving nine patients and nine caregivers from two VAD centers in the Midwest. We asked them to use the app daily for more than 30 days and complete an app Evaluation Questionnaire and an interview. The questionnaire uses a five-point rating scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) evaluating usability, acceptability, and competency domains. Data generated from the questionnaires and interviews were analyzed with descriptive statistics and content analytic procedures. A total of 16 users (eight patients [all male] and eight caregivers [seven female]) aged 22 to 68 years completed the 30 day study. Median acceptability, usability, and competency scores were 4.6, 4.5, and 4.7, respectively. Based on the data, it is feasible for patients and caregivers to use an app as an LVAD SM tool warranting further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.