Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28937263›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2017

Imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis according to molecular subtype: association with breast cancer detection.

Su Hyun Lee, Jung Min Chang, Sung Ui Shin, A Jung Chu, Ann Yi, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and X-ray characteristics for expressions of different receptors in patients with breast cancer.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Su Hyun Lee1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Min Chang1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Ui Shin1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
A Jung Chu2 Department of Radiology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Yi3 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.
Nariya Cho1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woo Kyung Moon1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) according to molecular subtype and to determine whether the molecular subtype affects breast cancer detection on DBT.

methodsThis was an institutional review board--approved study with a waiver of informed consent. DBT findings of 288 invasive breast cancers were reviewed according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Detectability of breast cancer was quantified by the number of readers (0-3) who correctly detected the cancer in an independent blinded review. DBT features and the cancer detectability score according to molecular subtype were compared using Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance.

resultsOf 288 invasive cancers, 194 were hormone receptor (HR)-positive, 48 were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive and 46 were triple negative breast cancers. The most common DBT findings were irregular spiculated masses for HR-positive cancer, fine pleomorphic or linear branching calcifications for HER2 positive cancer and irregular masses with circumscribed margins for triple negative breast cancers (p < 0.001). Cancer detectability on DBT was not significantly different according to molecular subtype (p = 0.213) but rather affected by tumour size, breast density and presence of mass or calcifications.

conclusionBreast cancers showed different imaging features according to molecular subtype; however, it did not affect the cancer detectability on DBT. Advances in knowledge: DBT showed characteristic imaging features of breast cancers according to molecular subtype. However, cancer detectability on DBT was not affected by molecular subtype of breast cancers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedObserver VariationRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID28937263
PMCPMC6047656
OpenAlexW2754605150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.