Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28937157›Full record

ReviewDalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)2017

Mutual interference of Cu and Zn ions in Alzheimer's disease: perspectives at the molecular level.

Elena Atrián-Blasco, Amandine Conte-Daban, Christelle Hureau

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation of a New Methylimidazole-Containing Thiosemicarbazone as a CuChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of Cadmium Neurotoxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elena Atrián-BlascoCNRS, LCC (Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination), 205 route de Narbonne, BP 44099 31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France. christelle.hureau@lcc-toulouse.fr.
Amandine Conte-Daban
Christelle Hureau
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

European Research Council 638712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While metal ions such as copper and zinc are essential in biology, they are also linked to several amyloid-related diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Zinc and copper can indeed modify the aggregation pathways of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, the key component encountered in AD. In addition, the redox active copper ions do produce Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) when bound to the Aβ peptide. While Cu(i) or Cu(ii) or Zn(ii) coordination to the Aβ has been extensively studied in the last ten years, characterization of hetero-bimetallic Aβ complexes is still scarce. This is also true for the metal induced Aβ aggregation and ROS production, for which studies on the mutual influence of the copper and zinc ions are currently appearing. Last but not least, zinc can strongly interfere in therapeutic approaches relying on copper detoxification. This will be exemplified with a biological lead, namely metallothioneins, and with synthetic ligands.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesCoordination ComplexesCopperHumansLigandsProtein AggregatesProtein BindingReactive Oxygen SpeciesZincAmyloid beta-PeptidesCoordination ComplexesCopperLigandsProtein AggregatesReactive Oxygen SpeciesZinc

Identifiers

PMID28937157
PMCPMC5656098
OpenAlexW2758885111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.