Trial reportSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
The efficacy and safety of the left lateral position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Trial report in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ergonomic wedge pillow to reduce neck pain after prone ERCP; a randomized, controlled study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Positioning During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Procedures: A Comparison Between Semi-Prone- and Prone-Positioned Patients.Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and AssociatesTrial
- Comparative efficacy and safety of supine versus prone positioning in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Risk Assessment of Lateral Position Endotracheal Intubation Combined with Airway Surface Anesthesia in Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Study.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Ocular and the whole body radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Turkish journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Patient Position in Operative Endoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients with situs inversus totalis: multicenter case series and literature review.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Does ERCP position matter? A randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and complications of left lateral versus prone position (POSITION study).Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Common bile duct cannulation in the left lateral position during ERCP.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
- Controversies in ERCP: Indications and preparation.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Does patient's position count during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography? Left lateral decubitus versus prone position.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Impact of supine versus prone position on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography performance: a retrospective study.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is typically performed in prone position. In cases of difficulty in prone position, ERCP can be performed in left lateral position. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of left lateral position for ERCP compared with those of prone position. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween August 2015 and March 2016, a total of 62 patients with native papilla who underwent ERCP were randomly assigned to undergo the procedure in left lateral position (n = 31) or prone position (n = 31). The outcomes of procedures were compared between the two groups.
resultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the demographic data, indications for ERCP, comorbidities, anticoagulation agents, the types and doses of sedative agents, and procedural durations. The rates of technical success and adverse events were similar (96.8 and 40%, respectively, in left lateral group and 100 and 32.3%, respectively, in prone group). The rates of unintentional pancreatic duct (PD) cannulation and the acquisition of pancreatograms in left lateral group were significantly greater than those in prone group (9/30, 30.0% vs. 3/31, 9.7%, P = 0.046; 7/30, 23.3% vs. 1/31, 3.2%, P = 0.020, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (6/30, 20% vs. 5/31, 16.1%, P = 0.694).
conclusionThe left lateral position for ERCP can be as effective and safe as prone position. Due to increased rates of unintended PD cannulation and contrast injection, the initial use of left lateral position may be limited to cases that exhibit difficulty in prone position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.