Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28936969›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing.

Daniel Scott Himmelstein, Antoine Lizee, Christine Hessler, Leo Brueggeman, Sabrina L Chen, Dexter Hadley, Ari Green, Pouya Khankhanian, Sergio E Baranzini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 302 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
302citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

302 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. IMF-DDI: Information Mapping and Fusion Framework for Drug-drug Interaction Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

242 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel Scott HimmelsteinBiological and Medical Informatics Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3012-7446
Antoine LizeeDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Christine HesslerDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Leo BrueggemanDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Sabrina L ChenDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Dexter HadleyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Fransisco, San Fransisco, United States.
Ari GreenDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Pouya KhankhanianDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Sergio E BaranziniBiological and Medical Informatics Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0067-194X

Funding

Post GWAS approach to identify cell-specific genetic pathways underlying MS riskR01NS088155 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BARANZINI, SERGIO E · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Crowd-Assisted Deep Learning (CrADLe) Digital Curation to Translate Big Data into Precision MedicineU01LM012675 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI HADLEY, DEXTER D · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
Crowd-sourcing A STAR Functional Genomic Characterization of Cancer with Open Big DataUH2CA203792 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HADLEY, DEXTER D · 2016 to 2017
$634k
NCI NIH HHS UH2 CA203792NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088155NLM NIH HHS U01 LM012675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to computationally predict whether a compound treats a disease would improve the economy and success rate of drug approval. This study describes Project Rephetio to systematically model drug efficacy based on 755 existing treatments. First, we constructed Hetionet (neo4j.het.io), an integrative network encoding knowledge from millions of biomedical studies. Hetionet v1.0 consists of 47,031 nodes of 11 types and 2,250,197 relationships of 24 types. Data were integrated from 29 public resources to connect compounds, diseases, genes, anatomies, pathways, biological processes, molecular functions, cellular components, pharmacologic classes, side effects, and symptoms. Next, we identified network patterns that distinguish treatments from non-treatments. Then, we predicted the probability of treatment for 209,168 compound-disease pairs (het.io/repurpose). Our predictions validated on two external sets of treatment and provided pharmacological insights on epilepsy, suggesting they will help prioritize drug repurposing candidates. This study was entirely open and received realtime feedback from 40 community members.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningHumansModels, BiologicalSystems Biologycomputational biologydrug repurposingheterogeneous networkshumanmachine learningsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID28936969
PMCPMC5640425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.